Connect with us

Ancient Code

7 Irregularities that suggest Earth’s Moon was engineered

The unexplained

7 Irregularities that suggest Earth’s Moon was engineered

Even though the Apollo missions brought back to Earth huge amounts of data about the moon, it has remained an enigma for astronomers and scientists alike. Dr. Robert Jastrow, the first president of NASA’s Commission of Lunar Exploration called the moon “the Rosetta Stone of the planets.”

But what is it about the moon that fascinates everyone? Well, there are many people who firmly believe that Earth’s moon is actually a terraformed and engineered piece of hardware that has a 3-mile thick outer layer of dust and rocks. Beneath this layer it is believed that the moon has a solid shell of around 20 miles made of highly resistant materials such as titanium, uranium 236, mica, neptunium 237Definitely, elements that you would not expect to find “inside” the moon.

There are many UFOlogists around the world who speculate that the moon is actually a giant base where extraterrestrials survey mankind’s progress.

There are so many mysteries surrounding Earth’s moon that there are those who have proposed that the moon could be something entirely different.

Robin Brett, a scientist from NASA stated, “It seems easier to explain the non-existence of the Moon than its existence.

moonufo

 

Here are 7 Irregularities that suggest Earth’s Moon was engineered and might be a giant hollow base:

1) The Moon seems engineered. On November of 1969, NASA intentionally crashed a lunar module that caused an impact equivalent to one ton of TNT on the Moon. The shock waves built up and NASA scientists listened to what was happening on the Moon. Strangely, after impact, NASA scientists said that the Moon rang like a bell and the reverberation continued for thirty minutes. According to Ken Johnson, supervisor of the data and photo control department, the Moon not only rang like a bell but the whole Moon “wobbled” in such a precise way that it was “almost as though it had gigantic hydraulic damper struts inside it.

2) The Moon has elements it should not have. In the 1970’s, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcerbakov from the Soviet Academy of Science wrote an article called: “Is the Moon the creation of Alien Intelligence?” It was a very interesting article that asked some important questions. How is it possible that the surface of the moon is so hard and why does it contain minerals like Titanium? Mysteriously there are some lunar rocks that have been found to contain PROCESSED METALS such as Brass, the elements of Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 that have NEVER been found to occur naturally. Yet there are traces of them on the Moon. Uranium 236 is a radioactive nuclear waste which is found in spent nuclear and reprocessed Uranium. More interestingly, Neptunium 237 is a radioactive metallic element and a by-product of nuclear reactors and the production of Plutonium. You have to ask the question: What is happening on Earth’s Moon? From where do these elements and minerals come from?

3) Earth’s Moon does not have a solid core like every other planetary object. Researchers are nearly 100 percent sure that the Moon is, in fact, hollow or has a very low-intensity interior. Strangely, the Moon’s concentration of mass is located at a series of points just below the surface.

4) The Moon is older than Earth. Our Moon is unlike any other satellite discovered in the known universe. Researchers know the Moon is 4.6 billion years old and that raises a lot of questions. This means that the moon is older than the Earth by nearly 800,000 years according to scientists.

5) Incredible orbit. Earth’s moon is the only moon in the solar system that has a stationary, nearly “perfect” circular orbit. It’s a fact that the Moon does not spin like a natural celestial body. In other words, our Moon does not share any characteristics with other moons found in our Solar System. If that isn’t strange enough, consider that from any point on the surface of our planet only one side of the Moon is visible. What is the moon hiding?

Earth-Moon-Incline

6) Lunar rocks and titanium. There are some lunar rocks that have been found to contain ten times more titanium than “titanium rich” rocks on planet Earth. Here on Earth, we use Titanium in supersonic jets, deep diving submarines and spacecraft. It’s unexplainable. Dr Harold Urey, Nobel Prize winner for Chemistry said he was “terribly puzzled by the rocks astronauts found on the moon and their Titanium content. The samples were unimaginable and mind-blowing since researchers could not account for the presence of Titanium.

7) Precise position. If all of the above points do not get you to think differently about the Earth’s moon; here are some more interesting things about the Moon. What is keeping the moon in its nearly perfect position? The moon has a precise altitude, course and speed, allowing it to “function” properly in regards of planet Earth.

Simply put the Moon should not be where it is currently. Everything points to the possibility that Earth’s moon was in fact placed into its current orbit in the distant past. The Moon’s unnatural orbit and irregular composition raise hundreds of questions that neither NASA scientists, astronomers or geologists are able to answer today. Despite all efforts to understand Earth’s “natural” satellite, the truth is that we have very little information about the Moon’s origin and purpose. What do you think the moon is? A nearly perfect natural occurrence? Or do the Moon’s origins surpass human understanding?

69 Comments
  • Emily Byron

    The moon is where heaven is

    • The One

      Eh??

      • Emily Byron

        My first friend tells me beautiful stories

        • Soman K

          Dear All,
          Apparently moon is of 3,500 km radius!!! as such who shall be able to make it except god??. It is simple, the god who created universe created moon also which shall give light (reflected from sun) for all inhabitants of earth.

          • markedx

            yeah sure, once people thought lightning was God’s doing too. Like many things that couldn’t be explained in the past were assumed to be God’s doing

          • Nathan Togain

            Indeed,the Mayans also used to think they had to continue to sacrifice people so the sun would rise everyday or to make sure it wouldn’t be eaten by the moon during an eclipse.

          • Henry

            Dear Soman, It’s true, Earth and the universe are created by gods, but the moon is man-made. No joke. Humans have been around since before this Earth was remade, and the moon was made by the humans of the previous Earth. That’s why it’s older than our current Earth. Our current Earth is only around 100 million years old. It was reconstructed from the remains of the previous Earth, as far as I know. That’s why the materials and many remains are a lot older. Most of the many previous cycles of Humanity were far more advanced than ours is now, and the humans themselves, who varied more in shape and size, were much closer to gods back then, and had far greater abilities. Our modern Western education is based on an intentional big fat lie designed to keep us from reaching our true potential. I don’t expect everyone to believe me, but if you want to know more: http://www.falundafa.org
            If you don’t get to study this, just remember these three words: Truth, Compassion, Tolerance. I wish you the best.

          • Tomasina Serveaux

            Just don’t expect God to care about feeding the hungry or curing sick children. He just wants to make sure you don’t stub your toe on a tree root when you leave your hut to pee in the bushes.

  • Allan Stark

    One of your finest presentations I’ve seen. Got it all in. And it’s all verifiable fact & data. Best overview on this subject. Thanks loads.

    • Thank you Allan!

    • Nick Epstein

      Literally none of this is verifiable fact. Are you serious? This article had the audacity to say the moon doesn’t rotate on its axis and that is has a hollow core, neither of which are true.

      The premise of this entire article is based on decades old research that has since become obsolete. It quotes a Soviet paper that posits the Spaceship Moon Theory, a theory which was debunked by Cornell for not considering the moon is the only planetary body besides Earth on which extensive seismic observations have been made. These observations have constrained the thickness of the moon’s crust, mantle and core, suggesting it could not be hollow.

      Don’t fall for this clickbait. Do you see how any advertisements are on this page? This cheap website and author are simply trying to generate traffic for a profit. They know they’re lying.

      • Why bother commenting? Hope you really avoid us in the future.

        • Nick Epstein

          To ensure that people are not so easily fooled into subscribing to your for-profit misinformation campaign.

          • As I’ve said above, thanks for you opinion. Its up to all of our visitors to opt and read an article or not.

            And hey, at least you took some time and visited, that means something.

            Have a good one.

      • And Nick… You don’t know me so you ought to know better than talk about me.

        • Nick Epstein

          You publish lies and misinformation to generate ad revenue. I know all I need to — you’re not a great person.

          • I really do not know why you have so much hate inside of you Nick, grab a beer mate. Oh and… everything written in this article is in fact verifiable. Second, just because you do not share my beliefs doesn’t make mine lies. And as I said, you really don’t know me and shouldn’t judge a person like that. And I write for more than one website, and that doesn’t mean I own them.

            But, hey its your opinion, have a great day.

  • farzad bahrampour

    thank you

  • Awesome article well focused with the facts that have been recorded and with that we all have to know there is things we are not being told simple we would not be in such a rush to get to the moon and then all of a sudden NASA does not want to step a foot on the moon which tells me there is a hole lot more they know that we don’t but would love to know, I don’t know if this has a factor in the truth or not I was talking with a friend and we came up with this the moon might be Eden in the bible it talks about the firmaments rising during the flood well what if the atmosphere of earth and the moon were being filled so full with water like a bubble being filled from the in side that they touched and let Noah travel through the abyss because they just describe it as being dark and raining so they could have been making the journey from Eden/moon to the earth let me know what you all might think it seems possible and if this is so that is the reason why they don’t want to tell us because everything that was in the word is true and they are scared to death to let the people know because then we will see how the governments use religion for there empowerment against the people just like Jesus and other Prophets spoke about so yeah let me know what you think thx

  • ☢ Andrew ∆ James ☢

    “Astronauts to the moon… Ha ha ha.” -The Coneheads

  • Konstantinos Kovlakas

    “5) Incredible orbit. Earth’s moon is the only moon in
    the solar system that has a stationary, nearly “perfect” circular orbit.
    It’s a fact that the Moon does not spin like a natural celestial body.
    In other words, our Moon does not share any characteristics with other
    moons found in our Solar System. If it wasn’t strange enough, from any
    point on the surface of our planet, only one side of the Moon is
    visible. What is the moon hiding?”

    My profession is not “writer”, “author”, “jurnalist” or “bloggist”. I’m a physicist and till now I concentrated on Astrophysics.

    No orbit in the solar system is stationary. “Nearly perfect” are ALL orbits as in Celestial Mechanics there are so few reasons for an orbit to change… no mystery here: Conservation or Angular Momentum, Linear Momentum and Energy, and rare intruders (e.g. freelance planets wandering about in the Milky Way and disturbing our gravitational field.)

    The Moon does not spin like a natural celestial body: yeah it spins in the same speed that it rotates around the Earth so we see “approximately” the same face: we see 59% of it as the Moon “librates”. These resonance between rotation and orbit is no mystery too: Tidal Locking. A phenomenon observed in various intensities for various classes of objects.

    And this is just for (5). In other words, this is WHY science is done by scientists, medicine by doctors, teaching by teachers, nursing by nurses. Everybody can be a “writer” or have a job or blog online…

  • Robert Ernest Charles Eady

    For a detalied account of how the moon came to be as it is, check out Alec Newald’s 12-day alien abductee account in his book Coevolution or listen to his interview on You Tube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvvuX8KZ6FI. Yes the moon is an artificial body and it is older than the Earth because the ancient aliens who inhabited it engaged in an accelerated evolutionary project that failed – read the book which has been updated.

  • Jock Doubleday

    Yes. Here’s my science blog on our hollow spacecraft moon. Just science, no bullsh*t.

    “Waiting for the Hollow Moon”
    http://waitingforthehollowmoon.blogspot.ba/

    • Doc Knowles

      Just took a look at your link. Wow! Great stuff!

  • Aaron Matteson

    every other planetary object is NOT solid. Take a look at a book called Hollow Orbs by Ian Liambrecht.

  • Kevin

    1. Sound waves on the moon are completely different to those on Earth due to lack of atmosphere. What you here on a foreign planet will be foreign noises to the untrained ear.
    2. The moon and the earth contain the exact same elements that make up its entire existence. There has NEVER been any factual data on the NASA logs of manufactured elements. It’s not a cover-up conspiracy, just a partially bullshit statement.
    3. The moon 100% DOES have a solid core. It has been scientifically proven over and over again. I too can make stuff up, like avocados are made from monkey turds.
    4. This statement is so impossible to prove that it’s nonsensical. The Earth is approx 4.5 billion years old and the moon came into existence approximately that same time. And yes, it is possible that the rocks/dust on the moon came into a globular shape prior to earths formation, just floated around for a bit and eventually got sucked in by earths gravitational field. But so what, so are trillions of other floating celestial objects that are present in the universe. This does not prove the moon is fake.
    5. Ivan, the author of this statement clearly never took science nor astronomy classes.
    6. Stuff that floats in outer space will ALWAYS be unexplained. This topic is the least known topic fully understood by humans.
    7. Newtons law and Einsteins law make this statement meaningless.

    • Thank you for your post. BS should be traced back to its source and then spread all over the guys front lawn. (Including BS coming from politicians) IMO! ! !

  • Betelgeuse

    Kevin is a butthurt troll.

  • Jaya chandra Royal

    if earth has such high quality material then people on earth should reach out to moon and use its resources for making earth a good place to survive instead of destroying it for space exploration or to settle on some other planet.

  • It would have been considerate by the author to reference his assertions to provide us with a research trail for “the facts.” IMO that is.

  • David Matthew Dalleinne

    lol..half of this is straight up lies…just blatant lies..the other half is out of context total bullshit.

  • Niki

    “From where are these elements and minerals coming from?”

    It should either be “From where are these elements and minerals coming?” or “Where are these elements and minerals coming from?”. No need to use “from” twice in one sentence.

    As far as the content and “facts” go, it’s plausible but by far not undeniable proof. I love ancient aliens theories, and interpretations of ancient stories to make it sound like our original Gods were actually extra terrestrials. Do I buy it all hook-line-and-sinker? Nope. It’s just fun to think about. I’ll stick with the more widely accepted scientific facts and theories until other theories prove themselves.

    • Tony

      Who gives a fuck if you know your grammar just because someone may spell some words incorrectly doesnt mean your more intelligent then they are,maybe they were educated to think instead of memorize an you know what they are saying

      • Niki

        While I agree that spelling correctly and using proper grammar are not always indicative of one’s intelligence, if you’re going to put out any kind of article proposing a new scientific theory or providing evidence of an existing theory – don’t you think it should be written without grammatical and spelling errors to be taken seriously? Besides, you don’t even have to memorize this stuff any more, we have a multitude of spelling and grammar checking programs at our disposal. Some are even free. So there’s no excuse for poorly written articles.

        • Doc Knowles

          Since Ivan isn’t a native English speaker here’s my suggestion to any of you who are so “outraged” by the mistakes you’ve found…..try your hand at writing anything scientific in say….Russian or make it easy on yourself, do it in Italian. Let me know how that turns out.

          • Niki

            I’d probably have a native speaker proof the piece prior to publication.

          • Doc Knowles

            I try to help him with that myself, but Ivan has written hundreds of articles and it just isn’t possible for me (and I think one other “helper”) to get to them all edited. So again I suggest to you that the idea of being fussy over a clumsy use of the language or an obvious grammar issue is really like stepping over a dollar to pick up a penny. Just sayin’

          • Niki

            *shrug* And that’s your opinion. I just feel that taking the extra time and putting forth the extra effort to ensure the least possible errors in what you intend to be a scientific explanation or evidence lends the piece more credibility. You took more time to develop it. That’s all.

        • poontofview

          This isn’t a spelling quiz, nor an English class, and a spelling test won’t be given at the end of the comments. I have never been very good at spelling and when spell-check came out I try to use it when I can. This topic isn’t on spelling anyway, it’s on the “Moon.”

          I don’t care what anyone thinks about my point of view on this Moon issue. I’ve not only read several articles on this Moon being an actual unnatural satellite and have just finished watching the History Channel Ancient Aliens series including an updated hour on the Moon onf this very subject. In the program they bring up the factual points of the size of the Moon and it being almost exactly the perfect distance between Earth and the Sun where the Moon is the exact distance between the two that during an eclipse there’s no over or under-lapping around the edges and the odds of this occurring naturally in nature is a “zillion”to one, meaning it’s strongly unlikely that it would ever happen naturally. Also, the Moon Dust being made up of basically 3 different minerals with no others in the mix is also very unlikely.

          • Niki

            I’m not saying that spelling mistakes invalidate the premise behind the whole article, just that such mistakes tend to distract the reader from the actual message and hurt its credibility. This “what’s the big deal” attitude toward simple spelling mistakes is rampant in today’s news, not only opinion pieces. Major news agencies such as CNN regularly post news articles containing blatant mistakes. It’s like nobody values editing any more. And while I understand that the author of this particular article is not a native English speaker, there are so many out there who are and they still make these mistakes. And the ones making them are usually college educated with degrees in things like journalism – how did they get so far without learning to look for and fix mistakes? I’m sorry, but this is something I feel strongly about. There is every tool out there to help those who aren’t strong with words get their point across. I’m not even looking for 100% blemish-free writing, just make an effort to fix the most garish mistakes.

          • poontofview

            Point taken and deserving Niki. You’re correct about the large news agencies going to print with all kinds of errors in their stories and in the past I have written some of them about their editing or lack of it. At the end of the day or actually the end of making my voice be heard on an issue I try to leave it at he door, outside, to enter a peaceful home where the days issues have no place in here. As much as I can, I try to appreciate life as it really exists, one-breath-at-a-time and here I feel all the peace and happiness that’s right here inside of me. In this place every living Human being is treated equally and there’s nothing that need be proved.

  • FrizzHed

    Loosen the tinfoil hats. Your brain is dying.

    • Matthew Twohig

      My brain is dying …says frizzhead lmao

  • Tomasina Serveaux

    “We don’t understand it, therefore it shouldn’t look the way it does, therefore aliens.” Great job, guys! Why NASA doesn’t hire you, I’ll never know.

  • Orian

    My favorite part is

    • Doc Knowles

      When you can spell in Greek as well as you can in English you may be in a position of criticize. Until then….?

    • Matthew Twohig

      Ol grammar natzi who cares

    • DarwinGarcia

      Must be outsourced…

  • Scream Nevermore

    Fine. Send an expedition back up there, and start drilling. Let us know when you break into the secret alien base.

    • Slipmatwax

      Man cannot get to the moon without passing through the Van Allen radiation belts (not now, not then)

      • William Foundry

        Apollo flight trajectories bypassed the inner belts completely to send
        spacecraft through only the thinner areas of the outer belts.

      • Matthew Twohig

        Really read. Comment below fact

    • its just me

      you wont be saying that when china release there undoctored chang e2 orbiter images …wahat will nasa do them hhhhmmmm

    • ijams sum

      They already know the unbelievable facts !

  • Eric Johnson

    So the moon “has a very low-intensity interior”. Maybe it is supposed to be low “DENSITY”. I stopped reading at that point.

    • ijams sum

      Outside of human taught concepts were ignorant , the truth of processed minerals on the moon should be answered but our scientist have been stopped from any conventional concepts.
      Ask yourself why any evidence not conforming too current thinking is non-sense and not investigated ?
      Much has been surpressed from the main stream so read between the lines !

      OR YOU CAN QUIT LOOKING AND READING

    • Doc Knowles

      To you grammar and typo police. I suppose YOU’VE never made a mistake? True that in this case it was neither. It was just an unfortunate and simple error. Wow! How horrible is THAT! ………Get a life!

  • Rafa

    Who is allah or Mahoma? Why his religion symbol is the Moon? They already known something about the Moon!!!

    • Matthew Twohig

      Research the nasa apollo patches u will be amazed search what the symbols mean

  • lance kilbert

    Can I have your sources please?

  • Govinda Nandahar

    And the size of the moon is such that it covers the sun exept the corona, pure coincidence?

  • Arthur Arkwright

    Brass found on the moon? One assumes you can provide a link to an authoritative source.

  • Pingback: 外媒:这七件不合常规的事物 暗示着月球是设计出来的(组图) | 新视角()

  • Pingback: 外媒:这七件不合常规的事物 暗示着月球是设计出来的 – 中国参考()

  • Pingback: 外媒:这七件不合常规的事物 暗示着月球是设计出来的 – 聚焦中国()

  • Pingback: Scientific paper asks: “Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?” | Ancient Code()

  • Pingback: Scientific paper asks: “Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?”()

  • Pingback: Scientific paper asks: “Is the Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?” - MAESTROVIEJO()

  • Pingback: La Luna un Terraforming extraterrestre? - Guard for AngelsGuard for Angels()

More in The unexplained

Subscribe to Ancient Code

Enter your email address to subscribe to Ancient Code and receive notifications of new articles by email.

Join 107,456 other subscribers

Visit our Spanish website

Popular on AC

To Top