Connect with us

Ancient Code

Scientifically proven: Planets in our Solar System aligned as a Crucifix, the day that Jesus died

News

Scientifically proven: Planets in our Solar System aligned as a Crucifix, the day that Jesus died

Call it whatever you want, but according to researchers it scientifically proven. It’s an extremely rare astronomical phenomenon, it did not happen again after 33 AD for 600 years. It is an astronomical discovery that one that cannot take lightly.

On the 3rd of April 33, the date on which researchers agree that the crucifixion of Jesus took place, Saturn, Uranus, Jupiter, Earth and Venus lined up and took form of a crucified man. The discovery of this curious phenomenon was made possible thanks to Miguel Antonio Fiol, a historian at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

According to a press release published by the Christian Newswire, an illustration released on Monday depicts the planets Saturn, Uranus, Jupiter, Earth and Venus aligned on an orrery model to form what looks like Jesus Christ on the cross “with the head, the hands spread out and the legs together in accurate positioning, rotation and on a galactic scale.”

Planets - Jesus - Alignment

Planets Saturn, Uranus, Jupiter, Earth and Venus are shown aligned on an orrery model to form what looks like Jesus on the cross. Image Credit: Miguel Antonio Fiol

“There are quite e few studies which indicate with precision the date that Jesus Christ died: The bible, Calendars, Astronomical conditions and even geology,” said Miguel Antonio Fiol.

“Those planets rotate as opposites or mirrors, like your left and right hand and your feet,” said Miguel Antonio Fiol, the researcher who made the discovery.

An illustration published to show the discovery shows what position the planets adopted during that time, 2000 years ago. Thus it can be seen that the rings of Saturn, on top of the planetary figure, have the appearance of a halo or a crown, reminiscent of the crown of thorns on Jesus’ head. Likewise, Uranus and Jupiter represent hands, while the feet would be formed by Earth and Venus.

“Even at first glance I knew it looked like the crucifixion,” Mr. Fiol stated. “But it took time to uncover all the incredible parallels. According to the historian, the planetary alignment began in mid-March and lasted until the middle of April in the year 33. This same alignment occurs once per cycle of 333 years, which means that it has happened six times, between the year 0 and 2000.

“It’s hard to put it into the coincidence category,” Mr. Fiol told the Gospel Herald in an emailed statement. “This unique alignment happened for only a month in 33 A.D. and then not again for 600 years. So rare is it that models show me it won’t happen again from now until around the year 2900.”

17 Comments
  • Anthony Smith

    There is one piece of evidence that looks like the Romans crucified people by having both feet side by side together,turned through 90 degrees and then a SINGLE nail put through both heels.

  • Lucius

    Unbelievably inane hogwash, given that even if he lived he wasn’t born in the year 0. Matthew 2:1 states that Jesus was born during the reign of King Herod
    who died in 4 BCE.
    Now if they can only ‘scientifically’ prove he lived.

    • Justin Neddo

      There is a “near-universal consenus” among scholars that Jesus(Yeshua) DID exist historically. Christian sources verifying his existence abound, but I assume you will ONLY accept non-Christian sources?

      At least 3 official, contemporary, *independent historical records attest to his existence:

      — Governor Pontius Pilate presided over the trial of Jesus, and reluctantly gave the order for his execution, despite “finding no guilt in him [Jesus]”. Many comments and clear references to Jesus Christ can be found in his writings.

      — Titus Flavius Josephus, Romano-Jewish scholar and historian; in his ‘Antiquities of the Jews’, written c.93-94CE, are two references to the Biblical Jesus Christ in Books 18 and 20.
      (and a reference to John the Baptist in Book 18)

      — Publius Cornelius Tacitus was a Senator and historian of the Roman Empire. He is considered one of the greatest Roman historians. Tacitus makes reference to Jesus, and it’s clear that the person he speaks of is the Biblical Jesus Christ.

      Interesting to note is that even Pagan historians and writers made reference to Jesus, AND his “miracles” — though they unsurprisingly attributed his abilities to Demons… That is strong evidence in and of itself, that even his Opponents would acknowledge his earthly existence, works and abilities.

      ***Jesus of Nazareth was born c.7-2 BCE*** (btw there WAS no year “0”… and your *Assumption* that Jesus MUST have been born in 0, thus the BC/AD calendrical divide, shows how LITTLE research you’ve actually done into the subject)

      You seem to have a double standard when it comes to verification of secular/religious people, places and events –
      specifically increasing the quality of “proof” that you Demand in order to accept a claim such as the life of Jesus. (often kings and other persons of import, are taken to have existed based only on a handful, or even a single mention of said person’s name [inscriptions, historical texts, etc.]…
      You expect nothing less than UNDENIABLE, incontrovertible evidence of Biblical figures, before you’ll even consider accepting them as true historical individuals?
      (Myopic, irrational, anti-Religious hypocrite much?!?)

      [Whether or not he EXISTED, and whether he performed the acts attributed to him, are two separate questions.] The first is taken to be true beyond any REASONABLE doubt (your doubts are Not reasonable, but are rooted in fear and hate of the Bible, and the Desire to see it “debunked”…)

      • Tempest

        So no contemporaneous evidence at all then. Pilate is only connected to Christ in the bible. No where else. Josepheus lived well after Christ. The Tacitus have been shown to have been tampered with so keep on dreaming. There’s no historical eve dine for Santa either but millions of children believe in him!

        • David Miller

          I bet you believe in evolution though, and there’s not only zero evidence of it, but there have been proven cases of fraudulent concoctions, some of which are still taught as valid finds.

          • Tempest

            Lol, you’re so clueless that I can’t be bothered…..

          • David Miller

            1 Corinthians 1:26-27

            26 For you see your calling, brethren, that not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called.
            27 But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty;

          • rickd12

            DO YOU EVEN SCIENCE??? I love how you hyper religious types act like you’re privvy to something us mere mortals cannot handle. Smug and uncompromising you are, i have weighed the evidence impartially over many years and found it to be horse shit. Evolution makes more sense

          • David Miller

            The scientific likelihood that macroevolution is where life derived is 10 to the 760th, or 7,600,000,000,000 to 1 ratio. Scientifically absurd is defined as anything 10 to the 50th or larger. You believe in a scientifically defined absurdity. Science much?

          • rickd12

            Still makes more sense than god

          • David Miller

            1 Corinthians 1:18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.

          • rickd12

            “The sun also shines on a dogs arse”

            My Grandad
            Circa: unknown

      • David Miller

        No matter what evidence is presented there will be scoffers, there has to be, it’s prophesied. We are commanded to preach the gospel unto everyone, not sell or convince others of it, and not multiple times until they believe. In fact, were commanded not to soil the word by casting our pearls (the knowledge of the gospel) before swine lest they trample them under feet AND TURN AGAIN AND REND YOU ALSO. By preaching the gospel you bring judgement upon them by your testimony, so it’s no wonder why the seed of the serpent detests it so much when it is shared with them, and no wonder why they attack the messenger so violently. Remember that they hate you because you are not one of them. They hate you because you are Gods. And they hated Him before they hated you. The only things that will open the eyes of the truth is a broken and contrite heart. Those who refuse it without undeniable proof, Christ refused to give to them, and rather handed them the sign of Jonah, which is to convict them of their willful disbelief by seeking a sign to defend their disbelief.

        Commentary by Mathew Henry:
        Mat 12:38-45
        It is probable that these Pharisees with whom Christ is here in discourse were not the same that cavilled at him (v. 24), and would not credit the signs he gave; but another set of them, who saw that there was no reason to discredit them, but would not content themselves with the signs he gave, nor admit the evidence of them, unless he would give them such further proof as they should demand. Here is,
        I. Their address to him, v. 38. They compliment him with the title of Master, pretending respect for him, when they intended to abuse him; all are not indeed Christ’s servants, who call him Master. Their request is, We would see a sign from thee. It was highly reasonable that they should see a sign, that he should by miracles prove his divine mission: see Ex. 4:8, 9. He came to take down a model of religion that was set up by miracles, and therefore it was requisite he should produce the same credentials; but it was highly unreasonable to demand a sign now, when he had given so many signs already, that did abundantly prove him sent of God. Note, It is natural to proud men to prescribe to God, and then to make that an excuse for not subscribing to him; but a man’s offence will never be his defence.
        II. His answer to this address, this insolent demand,
        1. He condemns the demand, as the language of an evil and adulterous generation, v. 39. He fastens the charge, not only on the scribes and Pharisees, but the whole nation of the Jews; they were all like their leaders, a seed and succession of evil-doers: they were an evil generation indeed, that not only hardened themselves against the conviction of Christ’s miracles, but set themselves to abuse him, and put contempt on his miracles. They were an adulterous generation,
        (1.) As an adulterous brood; so miserably degenerated from the faith and obedience of their ancestors, that Abraham and Israel acknowledged them not. See Isa. 57:3. Or,
        (2.) As an adulterous wife; they departed from that God, to whom by covenant they had been espoused: they were not guilty of the whoredom of idolatry, as they had been before the captivity, but they were guilty of infidelity, and all iniquity, and that is whoredom too: they did not look after gods of their own making, but they looked for signs of their own devising; and that was adultery.
        2. He refuses to give them any other sign than he has already given them, but that of the prophet Jonas. Note, Though Christ is always ready to hear and answer holy desires and prayers, yet he will not gratify corrupt lusts and humours. Those who ask amiss, ask, and have not. Signs were granted to those who desired them for the confirmation of their faith, as to Abraham and Gideon; but were denied to those who demanded them for the excuse of their unbelief.

        ——
        It’s one thing, and a very good thing to seek out truth and search for evidence to affirm or adjust our beliefs. It’s quite another to refuse evidence out of hand without investigation and an open mind.

  • Hisyam

    woa…this is too much! i don’t know – should i cry or laugh!

  • Tempest

    Pure unadulterated twaddle. If the drawing was to scale they wouldn’t even be close. Religious nutters rejoice. You have a new tin foil crown wearing King.

  • Levon

    so, if it happened again 600 years later WHAT significant event happened around that time because if the first time it happened was when Jesus was killed then something must of happened the second time it happened… and what about when its supposed to happen again in 2900 – ?

  • Pingback: Scientifically Proven: Planets In Our Solar System Aligned As a Crucifix, The Day That Jesus Died()

More in News

Subscribe to Ancient Code

Enter your email address to subscribe to Ancient Code and receive notifications of new articles by email.

Join 4,204 other subscribers

Visit our Spanish website

Popular on AC

To Top