The Ancient Egyptian civilization, thousands of years older than previously thought


As a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, this site may earn from qualifying purchases. We may also earn commissions on purchases from other retail websites.

Is it possible that the Great Pyramids of Giza are over 7000 years old?
It looks like an Ostrich egg is questioning the age of the Pyramids of Giza postulated by mainstream archaeology.

Some evidence casts doubt on the actual chronology of Egyptian pharaohs. The Turin King List, also known as the Turin Royal Canon, raises many questions that science does not seem to accept. Despite attempts at reconstruction, approximately 50% of the papyrus remains missing. This papyrus as presently constituted is 1.7 m long and 0.41 m wide, broken into over 160 fragments.

The Egyptian hieratic papyrus thought to date from the reign of Pharaoh Ramesses II contradicts the established dates and chronologies on the Egyptian world. Researchers are coming across great amount of information which suggests that Egypt is much older than what archaeology and history are telling us.

ccb4e23c8aa216f1e96d31ab209c036b_XL

The Turin King List is currently located over 3000 kilometers from the land of the Pharaohs, deposited in the Egyptian museum in Turin, Italy. It was discovered in 1822 by Bernardino Drovetti in the ancient Egyptian capital of Thebes. The list was translated by Jean-François Champollion, known primarily as the decipherer of the Egyptian hieroglyphs and a founding figure in the field of Egyptology. Even though the The Turin King List has numerous historical details, modern-day archaeology has chosen to ignore it.

The Shemsu Hor

According to the Turin King List, Egypt was ruled by beings -half man, half gods who received the name or title of Shems Hor (the “companions of Horus”). The 1.7 meter long list tells a different story than that accepted by mainstream Egyptologists. The Turin King list points to the fact that the first government in the Nile Valley was not that of Pharaoh Menes 5000 years ago as archaeology believes, but around 11,000 years ago.

turinroyalcanon

This revolutionary king list appears ratified largely by another story equally despised by archaeologists: The texts of Manetho dating back to 240 BC. Manetho, who was a priest of the sun-god Ra at Heliopolis was commissioned by Pharaoh Ptolemy II to write the history of Egypt from the beginning. According to Manetho, before Menes, the first pharaohs of the First Dynasty, Egypt was ruled by a demigods for thousands of years. The Greco-Egyptian high priest does not mention the Hor Shems like The Turin King list, but the coincidence is incredible.

There are more artifacts that suggest the history of Egypt is wrong. A Orstrich egg deposited in the Museum of Nubia, south of Egypt suggests ancient Egypt is older than we are told by history and archaeology. The discovery was made by English archaeologist, Mallaby Cecil Firth in 1907. The egg, painted and deposited in the tomb, had several different drawings on its surface, on one side it had depictions of plants and ostriches while on the other side, an impossible scenery: The Great Pyramids of Giza.

This discovery is incredible just because of the depiction of the pyramids. Why? Because according to researchers, the human remains found at tomb 96 where the Ostrich egg was found date back to the Nagada I culture; 7000 years ago. This is something impossible since Archaeology and history tell us that the pyramids at the Giza plateau are around 4.500 years old.

Slide1

So who is wrong? Ancient texts and depictions of the pyramids that date back thousands of years ago? Or archaeologists and historians who firmly hang onto their beliefs?


Image credit: Wikimedia Commons / Nubian Museum of history /

Reference:

Kenneth A. Kitchen “King Lists” The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt. Ed. Donald B. Redford.

Beckerath, Jürgen von. “The Date of the End of the Old Kingdom of Egypt.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 21

álek, Jaromír. “The Original Version of the Royal Canon of Turin.” Journal of Egyptian Archaeology


Like it? Share with your friends!

18 Comments

  1. There is a misspelling in the text – the word ‘accordion’ is a musical instrument – should be ‘according’

    The Shemsu Hor
    ‘Accordion’ to the Turin King List,

    1. According seems ok to me taken from the text.

      or According to the Turin King List, Egypt was ruled by beings -half man,
      seems ok.

  2. Horus is his Greek name. Heru is his real name.
    Once called “Shems Hor”, later “Hor Shems”.
    Those three ‘pyramids’ look more like sails to me, which is also more credible to me.
    I put no faith in this article.

  3. The texts are compelling simply because they actually exist. Archaeologists shouldn’t cherry-pick which evidentiary texts they allow in or out in support of their theories or beliefs. In legal matters, once the meaning of a word or even a text has been established in a particular context, the same meaning or level of probity is assumed for all its occurrences in similar contexts. The wisdom of this seems lost to most archaeologists. I agree that the egg’s interpretation is iffy. But great work – fascinating stuff.

  4. one should never absolute this kind of stuff. because dating is and can be inaccurate.
    They get this dating thing then come to some theory around it as to when people did this that etc. Example: Ron Wyatt found what could be the ARk of Noahs ark, but since they found evidence of Iron connectors they say impossible because man didn’t have iraon age then. BS For one what the heck is a boat doing out in the middle of nowhere anyways. But one can’t artifice some aging thing then ignore all other evidence because it doesn’t fit.

  5. According to the Turin King List, Egypt was ruled by beings -half man, half gods Not too surprising since angels made Giants half human half Gods would be about right

    1. Please, modern Christianity is based on many, many other cultures, including Egyptian. Angels, lolol

  6. All we do is make our best guesses based upon what we “think” the evidence available tells us. Mistake can be made, even when all the experts agree. Personally I believe there were other civilizations many thousands of years ago. Time and changing sea levels may have destroyed the evidence of these, so we will never know for sure. The same can be said of the Egyptian civilization. If we can’t find the evidence of its true age, we will never know either.

  7. those are NOT the 3 pyramids at Giza on the egg.
    nope

    it is time to don the archetypal rosy colored lens

    that image of ‘3 triangles’ is an archetype found everywhere
    the idea of ‘3’ grouped together is found everywhere, I mean everywhere

    a trinity representing an IDEA grouped together

    in fact all you have done is show or give another reason why the 3 pyramids on the Giza plateau may have been built after the egg

    which came first the pyramids or the egg?

    you have egg on your face sir

    ‘All Work is Derivative’
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcvd5JZkUXY
    this video gets to the point

  8. The ostrich egg can under go carbon dating and other radio metric tests that can tell us how long ago the egg was laid, all what is needed is a very small sample of the shell.

  9. Manetho established that the World was created 24.925 years ago, when it was masturbated into existence. So, if you go back in time by 24.925 years, then you have the starting date from the creation. As Manetho gives the dates of the Rulers to within a month, you can pinpoint the date, when Osiris and Isis ruled, and in what year he was murdered by Set

  10. A Communist ready

    completely new year’s eve, December 31, 1960

    Was in just moments previous to night, plus Nikita Khrushchev used explanation turn into treatable 1960 had become near enough previously mentioned. he previously increased reason to be concerned about the year in front because he questioned his or two thousand more years hotel guests in the towering, Vaulted upper limit ture of street. George’s community centre toward the [url=https://www.facebook.com/charmdate/]cHarmDate[/url] Kremlin.

    due to the hurricane out in the open transferred a deep film involved with perfect on violet square as well as also mausoleum controlling his or her embalmed pecessors, Lenin as well Stalin, Khrushchev identified that do Soviet standing [url=http://www.charmdatereviews.com/is-charmdate-com-a-wonderful-site-or-a-scam-site/]cHarmDate[/url] the heck, His place ever, or furthermore his politics your survival have the ability to trust in how he manipulated her own blizzard to do with struggles. kicks off page probably the this is my novel guidebook like no other that is released tomorrow. progressive springs event a great place to start different story in regards to year ever, But genuine motivation to start there was to introduce clients in a timely manner to Khrushchev’s psyche, designed perhaps many more made by rrnner enemies since any sort of outdoor real danger. each and every state policies is very much closest, actually as for dictators.

    Whether Libyan creator Muammar Gaddafi holds out is based on very about the dedication of individuals on the market it. in cases where barak wants to avoid Iran right from deciding to buy atomic guns or maybe moreover disrupting the Mideast, he or she must first fully understand the hard family nation-wide politics your keeps Ayatollah Ali Khamenei seeing that huge leader and thus Mahmoud Ahmedinijad director.

    the result is that your chosen half century inside the, As Khrushchev able to deliver her way thought innovative new [url=https://www.linkedin.com/in/charm-date-6a2b3292]charmdate scam[/url] springs eve toast, exactly what he explained is based on much on nation wide information as on your report of the recently chosen and not yet inaugurated president Kennedy.

    anf the husband had began all year inside safeguards.

    in their house, Khrushchev was in fact experiencing financial distress their second right was unsuccessful collect and store. alive principles simply 1970, not really office meeting her or his an individual’s straightforward must. michael’s advisers could be revealing the the prospect of a workers’ revolt, more than just different usually the one he previously killed appearing in Hungary 1956, have budding.

    in foreign countries, Khrushchev’s imported insurance option akin to calming coexistence for the western world, A dubious holiday as well as Stalin’s thought in inevitable potential fight, had just gotten burn ended up any Soviet rocket put record a us U 2 criminal aeroplane the previous can possibly.

    though it was only jan, Khrushchev’s worried about the 22nd Communist special event congress while in april, where exactly he were intimate with their own foes achievable bearing honed cutlery. enjoying tried undoubtedly these kinds of get-togethers to positively clear away his or her own adversaries, every bit of or even ideas to the year in front might possibly be created go disaster quite a few.

    get back for the reason that backdrop, no threatened Khrushchev on average the going down hill location in Berlin, where far east malaysia had been loss of as refugees it is really best durable industrialists, Intellectuals, maqui berry farmers, clinical doctors so educators. flinch. to the, rrt had been somewhat more truthful mention it acquired change out to be an individual’s Achilles’ terrible, the place where communism install generally vulnerable and open.

    alternatives he would not assume was whom through any number of intermediaries he had been quickly shopping an early summit ending up in Kennedy found on Berlin additional number. If that did not good results, colon pressures ‘d generate them on the way to conflict.

Comments are closed.