The mysterious descriptions of Noah’s Ark


Having a very unusual design, Noah’s ark is usually depicted in ancient illustrations as an ancient ship with a round hull, with a detailed prow and stern, having a keel running through the entire length of the ship. The top part of the ship has an unusual cabin that covers the entire length of the ship.

This is believed to be pure fantasy, based on “current” designs of the late Middle Ages in Europe, but the truth is we don’t seem to have any idea of exactly how Noah’s Ark looked like.

There are two descriptions of the ship appearing in ancient literature, strangely, neither of those descriptions seems to satisfy naval engineering standards since those designs illustrate a ship that is completely unseaworthy.

In the Old Testament Noah’s ark is described as a rectangular “box” with straight sides, having no bows, no keel nor hull. In fact, according to historians the Hebrew word for “the ark” is a box or container. Historians point that word games mean little here since the Hebrews they were a people without oceans and had extremely little experience with boats or naval engineering.


Noahs_Ark_Water_Diorama


In the description of the ark in the Sumerian accounts, Noah’s Ark is described as a cube if the translation were interpreted correctly. But this seems very strange since the Mesopotamians were a nation of the seas, and the Sumerians and later Peoples were well acquainted with the principles of shipbuilding and seaworthiness.

Most of the Sumerian cities had access to the sea and great ships are often described at anchor at Sumerian ports, so it seems very strange that the Sumerian accounts for Noah’s ark described it as a “box” or “cube”. The old testament provides good descriptions about the ark:

Noah Builds the Ark:
…14″Make for yourself an ark of gopher wood; you shall make the ark with rooms, and shall cover it inside and out with pitch. 15″This is how you shall make it: the length of the ark three hundred cubits, its breadth fifty cubits, and its height thirty cubits. 16″You shall make a window for the ark, and finish it to a cubit from the top; and set the door of the ark in the side of it; you shall make it with lower, second, and third decks…
A window shall you make to the ark, and in a cubit shall you finish it above, and the door of the ark shall you set in the side thereof; with lower, second, and third stories shall you make it. (Source: http://biblehub.com/genesis/6-16.htm)


Ark_Of_Noah


The Ark is referred to as “Teba” which in Hebrew would mean; “Box” (correct me if I’m wrong) It is described as a rectangular box with a flat bottom and straight sides, 300 cubits long, 50 wide and 30 high. Basically, the size of Noah’s Ark would be the following: its dimensions were 450 feet (162 meters), 75 feet wide (27 meters) and 45 feet high (16.2 meters), and such measures were made for the “ship” to successfully transport around 43,300 tons.

The Hebrews had a word for ship, but for some reason, they decided to call it a box instead. Having that said, the Noah’s “box” was not a seaworthy ship since its descriptions place the craft as being made without a keel, bow and other essential elements needed in the ship to remain at sea.

If the description of Noah’s ark were correct, then this box would have been tossed and pitched uncontrollably in stormy seas potentially ending in a catastrophe for the “ship”.

Some researchers believe that the Hebrew chroniclers may have felt that the word container would be more understandable to their people, indicating that the legend of the great flood was undoubtedly manipulated and modified by the early Hebrew priests to suit their purposes.

About_Gods_Ark

According to the descriptions, the ship was built of gopher wood, an expression that is entirely unidentified according to some researchers.

They point towards the fact that these words do not have a Sumerian nor Akkadian origin and have been a complete mystery since they do not appear in any other Scriptures.

So the question is, could they have referred to a particular type of wood or other material? And not “real wood”? Material processed to become waterproof by an impregnation process like the one that modern-day wood is submitted through?

The story of the great flood was well-known throughout the world and can even be found in the Epic of Gilgamesh believed to have been written about 2000 BC in Sumerian accounts going back to the 28th or 29th century BC. According to historians, the oldest parts of Genesis were not written before 1000 BC, and those were apparently versions of the Sumerian account which were passed through in Mesopotamia and the Levant in Akkadian or Semitic forms.

This actually indicates that the history of the Old Testament went through a series of changes until it finally became part of the Book of Genesis.

There seem to be several mysteries convening Noah’s Ark and many of the historical accounts do not fit into the story in a logical way. The question here is, what was Noah’s ark actually? Was it a ship, described as being a box, that somehow managed to sail through storms and stay afloat? Or is there another story to it? The possibilities are endless.


Image credit


Like it? Share with your friends!

17 Comments

  1. the ark is ordered and made by God’s Will., and thy Will be done..everything is possible!

  2. The ship had a ‘hull’, even though it was boxy, unlike what other ships would have, as the Ark was not meant to be sailed or navigated as others. It was to be floated and directed by God, not the crew. An expression of faith in God.
    The ark had no keel running the entire length as the ship, but is a non-essential, as the keel is also for controlling the steerage of a ship.
    The Ark had both a bow and a stern, as these terms denote only the front and the rear of a vessel. If both ends were identical, then it is meaningless semantics anyway. Again, a streamlined bow and stern are important only for a vessel being moved through the water and are not critical for a ship to float. Think raft.
    No, the Ark did not meet Naval engineering standards. Neither did the Kon-Tiki. Neither did the thousands of rafts that moved people and material down the rivers to build America. Or the early craft of all
    other areas of the world.

    1. And also the new population came from the Ark!! of course all cultures will have the same myth!! they all are descendants of Noah that went through the flood.!!

  3. All the animals and insects etc could have fitted into the ark……if it was their dna in vials stored in a gigantic….box.

  4. But that story was taken from a story 200 years older from the Egyptian texts.

  5. “Hebrews they were a people without oceans” […] “Mesopotamians were a nation of the seas” “Sumerians […] were well acquainted with the principles of shipbuilding and seaworthiness” – LOL

  6. I simply desired to appreciate you once again. I am not sure the things that I could possibly have followed in the absence of those tips discussed by you about such subject. It truly was a very difficult case in my view, but looking at your specialized approach you managed it took me to cry with happiness. I am thankful for this assistance as well as believe you are aware of a powerful job that you are undertaking educating most people via your web page. Most likely you have never met all of us.

    http://www.frc9.us

  7. When I initially commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get three e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service? Thanks!

    http://www.securehosts.us/

  8. Throughout the awesome pattern of things you get an A+ with regard to effort and hard work. Where exactly you confused everybody ended up being on all the specifics. You know, they say, details make or break the argument.. And that could not be much more accurate here. Having said that, allow me inform you precisely what did give good results. The authoring can be pretty convincing and that is possibly the reason why I am making an effort to comment. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, even though I can certainly notice a jumps in reason you come up with, I am not confident of exactly how you appear to unite your ideas that help to make the final result. For now I shall yield to your position however trust in the near future you actually link the facts better.

    http://apptools.u12files.com/new-jailbreak-hack-nonsense-diamond-v-1-3working/

Comments are closed.