Home / The unexplained / 290 million year old human footprint has researchers scratching their heads

290 million year old human footprint has researchers scratching their heads

Is it possible that we have history all wrong? That the dates that conventional history is giving us regarding mankind are all incorrect? That humans lived on Earth much sooner that science originally thought so? With all of the recent discoveries that are being made, it certainly seems like a possibility. A Possibility that mainstream scholars seem to have a problem with, since that would mean our history book would need to be rewritten? The origin of man and the fundamentals of religions would change a lot, and that is something that mainstream scholars cannot possibly deal with.

290 million year old footprint Ancient Code

At first this footprint might not seem like much, as you can probably come across it anywhere on Earth, but this is no ordinary footprint. You can obviously see the anatomy of it, it resembles a modern-day human foot, but the thing is, this footprint is fossilized and embedded into a stone that researchers believe is at around 290 million years old. That is a gigantic missing period of time that if proven to be accurate will change a lot of things in society as we know it today.

The discovery of the 290 million year old footprint was made in New Mexico by paleontologist Jerry MacDonald in 1987. In the vicinity of this mysterious footprint there are fossilized impressions of birds and other animals. The discovery of the human impression has left MacDonald particularly puzzled and not he or anyone who has seen and studied the impression has not been able to explain how this modern footprint could have been located in the Permian strata, which according to scholars dates from 290 to 248 million years, a time period which occurred long before man or even birds and dinosaurs existed on this planet, of course, that is according to modern science and scientific thinking.


Should we change the way we think and look at things? Or should we accept modern-day scientific thinking which suggests, there is no way that is a human footprint dating back 290 millions of years. It seems to be an ongoing debate between people who firmly believe that history is wrong, and those who point out that all of these mysterious findings are actually a hoax and have nothing to do with reality.

This 290 million year old footprint has been categorized by paleontologists as problematic as they do not seem to understand the way it got there, and better yet, who left it there. Basically some would say that to prove that this footprint which dates back 290 million years isn’t a fake, all we have to do is find something similar to it, and researchers have found numerous unexplainable things that can be connected with this footprint found in New Mexico.

In this image we see a similar footprint dating back millions of years, the only difference is that this footprint is gigantic and located in Africa.

Researchers have had mixed feelings about this footprint, and they don’t seem to try very hard to debunk it, nor have they argued about the authenticity of the footprint. According to most researchers, they comment on the matter saying that ” It just looks like a human footprint”. Well, it doesn’t only look like one, it clearly is one.

Ivan is a freelance writer, editor-in-chief of ancient-code.com, he also writes for EWAO, Share Knowledge, Svemir Online and Ancient Origins.

History, Archaeology, Space and world’s mysteries are some of the topics he writes about.

  • Andrew LaChasse

    I’m not saying it’s time travel but it’s time travel.

    • doc browne

      my thinking exactly 🙂

      • Nathan Togain

        I think it’s time travel as well. Just too many modern things being found.

        • pitchpole

          I the owner of this footprint possessed time travel technology I’m pretty sure they would be wearing shoes.

          • The Penitent Man


            Either that or they were enjoying a beautiful sunset with their main squeeze!

          • Atra Hasis

            From 300 million-year-old rock; Clearly seen are TWO trilobite fossils – one was actually CRUSHED beneath the shoe, and another later crawled ON TOP of the shoe print, becoming fossilized – Care to explain (away) that one?

          • Atra Hasis

            Or how about this one? Petrified shoe sole, with two rows (approx. 1/3″ apart) of clearly visible, regularly spaced minute perforations (as if something were sewn onto it, perhaps the rest of the shoe onto this ‘sole’)…

            Dated to about 200 million years BP

        • Andy

          Time travelers don’t have bear feet. They wear space boots, silly.

          • Nathan Togain

            Who says a person has to go into space to time travel? Maybe way in the future we won’t even need clothing hence no need of “space boots”.

          • MoreThanYou

            they do if they’re bear time travelers.

          • Kutastha

            What is it like to travel in bear time? How about water bear time? Everyone get into the Tardisgrade!

          • Heather

            I wonder who would have bear feet. Would be pretty angry feet

          • Tom C

            No, the Prime Directive doesn’t allow them to wear their space boots!

        • MagenD

          I’ll believe that when they dig up an Ancient I-Phone!!!

    • care package

      Wow. The mindset of making everything fit the old Earth model blows my mind, rather than question that itself.

  • Ashley Canfield

    I’m not sure if I believe it’s real or not. But being a science lover and always wanting to know more, I would either be trying to either prove or disprove this theory. You would think career scientists would have a lot of trouble trying to resist the urge to do the same. The fact that it could change everyone’s way of thinking about everything in life, would just make me want to know that much more!

    • Étienne

      There is also another fossilized human footprint that shows the fossilized remains of a trilobite. The trilobites became extinct 260 mollion years ago…food for thought.

      • Don_in_Odessa

        Really?!! Are trilobites anything like the coelacanth? … All is not as it seems to a man’s understanding, Grasshopper.

        • Flower

          Your point may be missed here. Some other interesting questions that nobody seems capable of asking:
          Why is it a bare foot? Why isn’t it wearing some sort of shoe or, at least, a moccasin?
          The lack of a more defined arch in the foot makes me wonder. The person who’s foot made this impression, was he/she very athletic at all?
          If the human(s) in the group(?) that made this impression were the Anthropologists favorite storybook people, i.e. semi-hairy, animal fur covered stooges only capable of communication thru grunting (think Jurassic rap “artist”), how has he developed an arch at all? My understanding is that the arch in a human’s foot results from centuries of wearing shoes. Hmmmm.
          Yes, the footprint is definitely that of a human being; however, it says nothing about where that human being originated. Mars, perhaps? Say, what were the conditions on Mars 250 million years ago?

          This footprint is like the cultures found that predate the Clovis People by 10-12 thousand years, but are ignored by mainstream Anthropologists. But, a footprint is a footprint, can’t argue about that. But more astoundingly, why aren’t we examining the TOOLS and MACHINERY that have been found in rocks dating to this time frame? Modern Anthropology is not a science, it is a religion.

          • meme

            you are born with an arch, it is not there because of your ancestors wearing shoes lol

          • Flower

            Not if all you do is walk in bare feet. lol

          • meme

            Native Americans walked in moccasins, ancient people walked in sandals . THEY HAD ARCHES!

          • Tom C

            Not until MacDonalds….then they had golden arches!

  • Option R Media

    Weve been here for millions of years, the blacks were and are original people, whites get cancer from the sun they can NOT have been here before us.. Whites can NOT have a dark or black baby, blacks can and do still have Albino babies… Whites want to cover up the fact that they come from blacks so they covered their history… Many whites walk around saying racism doesnt exist, but then get offended when yo call them black, just because they dont know or understand history, or science, nor do the accept it, as they are completely ego driven and this would crush their pride and egos…..

    • Seth

      racism obviously exists, you seem to cater towards it quite naturally. Keep on hating, you make the world such a more lovely place to live.

      • Nathan Togain

        Indeed Seth. Shouldn’t he be playing the “Knockout Game” somewhere and posting it on YouTube?

    • cutglass57

      What a sickening person you are Option. I bet you are one of those ‘We built ancient Empires blacks’. Yeah, right. You lay claim on Egyptians being black. TOTAL LIE. You lay claim on Jesus being black. TOTAL LIE. Your race may be older than white folks but you have accomplished so little in your history that you lie until you believe your own BS. You have a history of savagery that exists to this day. You have a near worship of crime and I’ve seen that on several occasions. You want to be proud of your race? Teach your race to STOP BREAKING THE FUCKING LAW.

      • Stephon Moore

        The facts are these: Herodotus, a Greek writer in the 5th century B.C. claims that “the people of Colchis must be Egyptians because like them they are black-skinned and wooly-haired.” (History, Book II.) The interesting thing about what Herodotus wrote is that had he believed the Egyptians to be any other color than black like other Africans he could have chosen other Greek words than the one he chose. His word is melaschroes, black-skinned. If Herodotus thought the Egyptians were white he would have used leucochroes. Had they been simply brown, like so many African Americans, he may have used phrenychroes, but he chose the word melaschroes. This word comes from the same root as Melanesia, the black island, or melanite, a black garnet. The ancient Greek use of “melas” was precise. Egypt is in Africa. Why shouldn’t the ancient Egyptians be anything other than black?

        The Greek philosopher Aristotle writes in the 4th century B.C. in Physiognomonica that the “Egyptians and Ethiopians were very black.”

        So cutglass57 argue with these guys I am sure you know who they are because they are white and you were taught who they were in school which is one reason I don’t fault you for being ignorant as fuck in regards to world history. If you are taught that noone in the world contributed to it but white people your views will sound retarded as fuck like they do in your last post. I understand you are mad at Black people, it is not your fault, it is societies, the media, your parents and every other racist that filled your brain to the rim with all that hate. But it WILL BE OK. You have always been an anti-social and tempermental people especially when you are in termoil within yourself, so your outburst is expected, but you should work on that.

        • tinmanbxx

          Dont teach that white devil. Let him continue to wallow in his own shit.

        • David Mowers

          Herodotus is called, by people from his own time, the “father of lies,” because he wrote as fact any statement told to him by anyone who claimed to be from an area or know its history.

          His works are nothing more than gossip and guesswork.

      • Stephon Moore

        1. Craniofacial analysis of Ancient Egyptian skulls groups them with modern East African populations such as the Somali and Oromo.

        2. Skeletal analysis of the Ancient Egyptian limb proportions reveal that they have tropical body plans indicating an evolutionary adaptation to a tropical environment of Ancient Egyptian ancestors.

        3. DNA studies reveal that Ancient Egyptian remains have African genetic lineages.

        4. Histological analysis of Ancient Egyptian skin indicates that the Ancient Egyptians were BLACK people.

        5. Ancient Egyptians artwork depicts them as brown-skinned TO JET BLACK with Afros and African style braids. Ethnographic murals show Ancient Egyptians to be much darker than light-skinned neighbors from Libya and Palestine .(only Nubians are darker).

        6. The Ancient Egyptian language has an Afroasiatic origin. Proto-Afroasiatic was spoken in the Horn of Africa region and disseminated before the formation of the Ancient Egyptian state. The architects of Ancient Egyptian civilization must have come from the South. This is supported by archeological evidence.

        • walcon

          And the white USA gives a lot of foreign aid to mostly dark countries especially Africa. Wonder why?
          Without white support, they would be in a world of trouble.
          Better hope progressive, intelligent, hard working whites don’t disappear.

        • David Mowers

          Yeah all that means nothing when you read the actual history which states that Egypt was founded, as a nation, by Celtic barbarians from Southern Russia.

          Try reading the Trogus.

          The Egyptians used red paint to color their artwork which contained Iron ore and turns brown over time.

          No one knows what the ancient Egyptian language was, how it was spoken, written or sounded because Egypt was broken up into different city states for thousands of years on again and off again being ruled by foreigners many times.

          Your DNA and skeletal analyses are all based on material from slave/worker graves.

          All upper class Egyptians shaved their heads and wore wigs made from hair from other races to accentuate their natural features.

          • Harry Wookiee

            Oh man, there you go, using facts.

          • David Mowers

            What is it with you Wookies?

            Stop touching me! Stop pushing me around!

          • White World Media

            the only thing you got wrong was the celtic issue, no celts ever lived in southern russia, they are western european, they carry haplogroup R1b, what you call celt is what is known as an “aryan” or “danubian” who carry haplogroup r1a. They are the ones that spread the “indo” european languages, the artistic motifs associated with it, the chariot and horses, wheat, barley, bronze work, the “indo european” thunder god motif.(i.e. thunder gods that ride chariots, use blunt weapons usually hammers, slay giant serpents and usually have red hair or skin with a big red beard) see Lei gong, Rajjin, Indra, Thor, Zeus, Tarhunt, Set, etc. also see the r1a project from family tree dna for proof of the aryan invasion theory. They invaded/expanded in 3200 bce and established the Irish megalithic civilization, the minoan civilization, the egyptian old kingdom, the sumerian civilization, the indus valley civilization/the later tocharian and kushan empires. One interesting thing is that Levite jews are aryan in origin as well as the fact that northern germanic peoples are the purest of the aryan people, they not only still carry the oldest branches of r1a, they carry all of the autosomal traits which were diluted everywhere else in the world due to mixing and recessive genes.

          • David Mowers

            Paul Pezron’s “Antiquities of Nations,” proves beyond any doubt that ALL Celtic peoples came from Russia, invaded or migrated into the Middle East and continued to Asia Minor and onward into Europe.

            He uses both recorded history and mythology and linguistics being the world’s foremost Celtic language expert in his time.

          • David Mowers

            You can read my analysis on ancient Egypt and the entire debate including recorded history, myth, DNA, archeology and linguistics on Robert Lindsay’s blog post, “What Race Were Ancient Egyptians,”

            I even went as far as to debunk Diop.

            You would probably enjoy Hamlet’s Mill and L.A. Waddell.

            I began with Sumer and have arrived at near-similar conclusions as your own.

        • White World Media

          Rahotep and Nofret along with most of the egyptian statues disagree with your afrocentrist theory, as do dna studies which show that the majority of ancient egyptians carried haplogroups J, R1a and R1b, caucasian groups, two of which are white european in origin.

    • Phanes Erichthoneus

      There is the possibility, too, that some of us have genetic ancestry from other planets—like even Mars. There are some of us, myself included, who find Earth far too hot. Mars would have been a cooler planet, even when it had an atmosphere. Some of us are allergic to so many things on Earth and we just sneeze like the dickens. Also, I find the sunshine on Earth to be far too intense. If my own genetic heritage has lines on Mars or some other planet, all the things I described above make sense. I have no proof, of course, but it does seem strange that some people just don’t seem to have a problem with allergies.

      • Kristian

        Come to the north and you’ll find it much more pleasant. We inherit both from our dna and our previous soul placement, like from Sirius, Antares +. Dna are for changing, that is what the “garbage” dna is for, and we are expanding our genetic code this very moment. First child is born with 3 dna-strings, they will evolve to twelve.
        And allergies are are pest of the western society – stress, bad food and toxic air. I’m not older than 30 but remember how rare allergies and diabetes was. Our immune system is controlled through the stomach because it’s like a big filter, is it so strange it collapses when we pour fake shit into it? Live long and prosper :]

    • usmcmailman


  • Pingback: TRANSCEND MEDIA SERVICE » 290 Million-Year-Old Human Footprint Has Researchers Scratching Their Heads()

  • iguana one

    First of all, the African footprint is an anomaly. it is just a freak, random formation that just happens to resemble a footprint from a human foot. Mars face anyone?
    And…………….the other footprint, 290 million years old? Obviously the carbon dating process is flawed completely on this specimen as well as others including the dinosaurs.
    Something is afoot!

    • MacFly1

      even with the evidence you can’t face it.

    • asdf

      they’re not using carbon dating – that only works on something that was once living. they’re going by rock layers.

      • davidnrobyn

        Not only that, but the half-life of carbon 14 is such that you can’t date things with any accuracy beyond about 12,000 years ago. 290 m.y. is nearly 25000 times older.

      • Steve smith

        Wellll…..if you believe the Eviloutionists, we are all from rocks. We are all just a big mish mash of chemicals that randomly came together creating the most intricate DNA and life processes.

        The question is asked….if you take 1 million monkeys with 1 million word processors, in 1 million years they will produce the complete IRS tax code. Maybe that is why we cannot understand a word of it. Damn Monkies.

        • Harry Wookiee

          No they won’t, that’s nonsense.

          • Steve smith

            Yes and so is Millions of Years…..total nonsense.

      • fgbouman

        There are a number of dating technologies – it isn’t necessary to depend on the layers. Here are a few:Radiocarbon dating, Radioactive decay techniques, including the Potassium-Argon and Uranium series methods, Thermoluminescence dating;, Fission track dating, Obsidian hydration rim dating. That’ll give you a bit to study up on.

    • patriot156


    • The fact you up voted your own dumbass post proves what a dumbass you really are.

      Do the world a favour and go back and watch more reality tv and leave these topics to the free thinkers.

    • The Penitent Man

      Dumbest rationalization ever dude.

  • MagenD

    Or, just maybe, things happened in the days of Noah that the mini gods —- who can’t put together anything much more complicated than a tin can that flies through the air (sometimes), computers and youphones —– just won’t be able to figure out!!!
    At any rate —– a good study of the earth’s Population alone – totally discount’s people being around very long at all!!!!

  • Sean Stout

    I’m thinking they got their dates wrong for how old they think that rock is. They think it’s almost 300 million years old, but they must be way off. The fact that bird fossils are found near it says it is being dated wrong.

  • mrknowitall
    • The Penitent Man

      Pretty neat looking. The giants presumed to live in ancient times were described to have six digits on both their fingers and toes. They also had a second row of teeth and the ancient stories said they were cannibals.

  • Curt Cope

    Look at some ancient ruins and the size of some of the stones to build them. Some blocks are so huge, that we, in our modern technology, can not move them. Do some reading on the forbidden and hidden history of AMerica.

    • The Penitent Man

      The reason we can’t move them, even with our modern cranes and such is because man is not as smart as he once was. We’re degrading genetically (genetic entropy) and at some point we will die out because the mutations will not allow us to survive.

      The Romans moved huge slabs of granite that we can’t budge today.

      • David Mowers

        Then you pick up a book written by Romans to see how they explain their method of moving large pieces of stone; framing and wheels.


        • The Penitent Man

          You lost me on that one.

          • David Mowers

            The Romans explained how they moved 1,200 ton stones when finishing the Temple of Baal in Jordan. They framed wheels around the stones.

  • patriot156

    Adam lived over 900 years and I believe they lived may 100ks of years ago not the 6k that most accept. But 200 milion years? Dunno. But I’ve seen that Giant foot print before and as it says in Genesis 6 there were Giants in the land.

  • Don_in_Odessa

    Hmm … on those top two pictures where’s the left foot print?

    • Tom C

      Man slowly evolved into a biped!

      • Don_in_Odessa

        “Biped” ??? Now you’ve gone and done it. Just had to bring up sexual preference huh!

      • Tom C

        At first, after evolving from a snail, man only had one foot!

  • 240 million years? They can’t even tell me when milk will go bad, let alone the dating of things. PROVE the time and I’ll show you my prize snipe!

    • Nathan Togain

      If it smells “weird” it’s bad. Do I win a prize?

  • Incriminally Sane

    All this proves is that their system of dating fossils is incorrect. Over the years they have found fossils in certain layers of the earth that, according to their dating system should be millions of years old, but they are not and they cannot do carbon dating on rock so they are forced to stick with their deeply flawed system. They title each layer of the earth as a certain “Period” which I think is the root of their problem, If you take a bunch of dirt and put it into a glass jar, fill it with water and shake it, it will settle into layers according to the weight of the particles in that dirt which should tell you that if there were a worldwide flood on this planet roughly four thousand years ago, all these layers would be developed and settle according to the weight of the particles in the dirt. Plus, it has been proven that it doesn’t take millions of years for particles to become “Fossilized” as it can happen in less than one hundred years, so, the system, fearing they will be declared incompetent, are forced to continue on the incorrect system for dating leaving them confused as to how human footprints could end up in a layer that is 248-290 million years old according to their incorrect dating system.

    • Nathan Togain

      Yeah!!! Tell em!!

    • Matthew Sileo

      There are numerous methods of radiometric dating aside from radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon dating has a limit of about 60,000 years, and is only used to date organic material. The Rubidium-Strontium dating method, on the other hand, allows for the accurate dating of igneous and metamorphic rocks that can be billions of years old – thanks to the 50 billion year half-life of rubidium-87. If a stratum containing a fossil lies below a lava flow dated at 200 million years, that fossil must be at least 200 million years old.

  • People’sArmy

    after the tree rings method of about 3000 years there is no way to date anything with any accuracy c-14 dating is a complete hoax the facts are anyone can make up crap based on there own personal calibrations methodologies? there is no way to date or measure time past 3000 years its just a theory at best! Truth look it up , think for yourself stranger!

  • keldoone

    the real history of Earth is stranger than science fiction fantasy.. get used to it.

  • Archeology and anthropology only accepts what can be verified. . Billy Meier’s input is not ‘recognised. Here is his input.. Accepting it is up to you.
    Humankind in this Dern Universe has a history of aprox 100 billion years, in this Great Time a Great Time being 311.04 trillion years. We are approx 70 trillion years into this Great Time.
    The Universes teem with intelligent and developing life.
    Millions have opened The Pleiadian Mission by Randolph Winters based on http://www.theyfly.com. and are centuries ahead of our blinkered, controlled scientists.

    • Flower

      70 trillion years, huh? And we’re no more advanced than this? I think it’s time for Mother Nature to go home and try it again.

    • care package

      Sounds like more vain imagination to me. Opinions mean jack. All men are biased.

  • Koolz

    If you are smart you do not follow main stream science. Main stream science is a lie it’s politically motivated and holds the truth of humanity back.
    It’s also run by Zionism. Even Ted Talks.
    Yes people were around millions of years ago.

  • Are we pretending radiometric dating has ever yielded an accurate result? They very often test two different spots on the same object and come up with two or more different dates, FOR THE SAME OBJECT. When this happens, they publish the date that they think is closest, based on . . . well, you know . . . science and stuff . . .

  • The Penitent Man

    I think their dating system is completely bogus, hence these anomalies. Hugh assumptions have to be made in order to arrive at these dates. There really isn’t any truly scientific
    method in my humble opinion.

    • David Mowers

      Carbon dating does not take into account changing cycles of the Sun over long periods of time. All stars change over time.

      • The Penitent Man

        Right, the scientists must make huge assumptions about many factors, not very scientific.

        • David Mowers

          Is the absorption rate constant?

          Is the Sun’s radiation constant?

          They never address this.

  • Defiant

    Since they can’t carbon-date rock…there’s actually no way to tell how old the foot print is.

    • Tom C

      There’s the Rubidium-Strontium whole rock method!

  • Pingback: The Liz Harrison Radio Show – Liberals Do Not Give Women Equal Pay! | Vigilant Liberty Radio()

  • meow

    Darwin evolution is BS. thats what it tells me.

    Lloyd Pye was correct in the end. ^^

  • Scott

    Well, all ‘things’ and theories put aside, if this footprint is indeed fossilized in ‘strata’ dating
    290 million years ago, then it would be a fact-hard to believe-but nonetheless. If it is a planted hoax, well, I don’t have to explain to you the logistics needed to accomplish that project, and, cover your tracks. No pun intended of course 🙂

    • David Mowers

      Yeah right. No one could have possibly carved that foot print ten thousand years ago and natural processes eroded it to make it appear natural.

      People were stupid until about the 20th century and never did things like carve rocks.

  • Harvey Thornhart

    It just goes to show you, religious adherents, anthropologists, and archeologists really don’t know their butt from a hole in the ground. They can postulate hypotheses and provide evidence for their theories all day; but in the end they know nothing.

  • Pingback: Liberals Do Not Give Women Equal Pay! | The Liz Harrison Radio Show()

  • douglas gray

    The ancient scriptures of India are the only ones which say man has been here on the Earth that long. There have been countless major and minor cycles of destruction. The young earth Bible adherents focus on time period on one part of the Earth and then see that as the whole picture.

    • Steve smith

      Read Genesis. All of it. GOD was there and told us what happened.

      There is no older earth. Either you know the truth of GOD’S word or you call GOD a liar and travel down the path to destruction.

      • Dana D’Agostino

        It isn’t black and white, Steve smith. Just because someone doesn’t believe in the Bible, does NOT mean they don’t believe in God. Since the bible is a huge part of YOUR religion, you equate the bible with god. However, it is just one holy book, on one tiny blue planet.

        • Steve smith

          I have no religion. Religion is not GOD and GOD is not religion.

          It is black and white. You may not think so now, but that does not matter. If you do not believe the WORD of GOD, you will very soon.

          The other books you may think are holy have no claim to being absolute truth. All the other books have no detailed prophecies that came true. No other books explain life and how it was created. No other book has never been proved wrong. The Bible is absolute truth. The Bible has a complete family history up to Jesus. The Bible explains history, science, mathematics, language and anything else you can think of. It is accurate as no other book is. That is why it is the largest selling book in the entire history of the world. It has had such an effect on this world that even the evil ones hate it so much as to try to make it illegal.

          I can understand why you do not believe the Bible and GOD’S Word. The Bible even explains why. How does it feel to be mentioned in the Bible? Unfortunately, because you do not believe, you are going to be in a world of hurt. That is not a good thing at all.

          Here is what I plan on doing for you…..I will pray to GOD that He sees that you get a chance to understand his Word. I hope that you get the understanding of the truth and that I see you in heaven.

          • Ron

            2nd Timothy ch3 vs 16″All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction for instruction in righteousness; That the man of God maybe perfect thouroughly furnished unto all good works”.

          • stone

            so explain the dinosaurs bible don’t say shit bout them

          • Steve smith

            The Bible talks about dragons and lizards. Lizards are today what dinosaurs were back when there was more oxygen in the atmosphere.

            All the dinosaurs died when the great flood came. Did you know that dinosaur bones are found along side bones of men? Did you know that the Bible does talk about behemoth in Job 40:15-24. And don’t forget the leviathans that the Bible talks about in Job chapter 41, Psalm 104:25,26 and Isaiah 27:1.

            So it seems you really have not really read the Bible enough. Study it ask the Holy Spirit for wisdom and then see the truth!

          • stone

            the bible was written by man not god. . and before the bible there were other gods. not just ur god. smh. jesus nut hugger . lol

          • Steve smith

            The Bible is GOD inspired. Do you not think that GOD who created the universe could not inspire men to write down his Words? How do you explain the prophecies made thousands of years previously that came true to perfection?

            The Bible is the most perfect writing in all of history. It has scientific, social and economic laws. It has never been proved wrong. Ever. Smarter people than you have tried and failed to show the Bible wrong.

            The Bible even talks of you…….amazing eh? It talks of scoffers in the end times….which you are……Second Peter 3:3 warns us that “in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following their own evil desires” (cf. Jude 1:18). We know from Scripture that scoffing will only increase as we near the time for Jesus’ return (2 Timothy 3:1-5).

            So you are of the lost. Now, you can be one of the saved…..if you want……repent as accept Jesus as your Lord and Savior…..otherwise you will be with those who regret ever hating GOD.

          • brieflycake

            How can you say people will go to hell if they dont believe ‘gods word’? Hell is a Roman catholic invention. It is not an original christian concept. How can an all forgiving god send someone to eternal suffering? Even we humans are more forgiving than that. The Bible is an incredibly inaccurate book. My encyclopedia is more accurate. What prophecies that came true? The only way you can say they came true is by twisting the words in order to mean something else. If I make a few prophecies, then of course some of them will come true eventually. You are an absolutely godless individual. You know nothing of that which is sacred. You are a brain washed zealot and you should be ashamed. If you’re going to be an advocate for Christianity, at least do your research. Check which versions of the bible were made when. If you had done that, then you would know that hell is not a christian concept.

          • Steve smith

            Oh is it? Hell is mentioned in Mathew 25:46 “”Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.”

            Or what about this….2nd Peter 2:4 “For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them into gloomy dungeons to be held for judgment”

            Bibilically illiterate people should not argue about what GOD is or is not.

          • brieflycake

            And is that the first edition of the bible? Or a later rework?

            How do you explain the fact that vast amounts of the bible were actually taken from ancient Egyptian religion?

          • Steve smith

            Religion is not GOD and GOD is not religion. Dogma was the result of man’s trying to control other men with religion. The WORD of GOD is not that at all. The truth will set you free.

            There is no proof at all that vast amounts of the Bible were taken from Egyptian religion. As a matter of fact, most all was based on Satanic perversions of the Bible to make people like you think it was based on those ideas instead of GOD’s WORD. You need to stop parroting what someone told you or you read on some anti GOD web site.

            I know there is a GOD and I see his creation everywhere. People such as yourself are not right now able to see it as you are stuck in your sins and pride. You are being deceived by the great deceiver Satan. You think you know but the only thing you know is that you think you know which means you don’t know anything.

            The WORD of GOD is fact and you will one day soon know that. Our lives are but a vapor. You days are numbered and on the very day of your death, you will know the truth. I hope that you find the truth and I see you in heaven before it is too late.

          • brieflycake

            True, god isnt religion. Neither is god a single man, or being. If god is anything, then it is everywhere and in everything.

            How do you know that they are satanic perversions? Have you any evidence for this claim? You dont ask for proof that the bible is gods word, yet you do ask for proof that it is not. That is pure hypocrisy. There is plenty of evidence that the bible drew its sources from Egypt.

            I hardly feel you can tell me to not ‘parrot’ other peoples words, when you have devoted your entire existence to just that. There is no evidence that the bible is gods word. Evidence matters, you cannot dismiss it. Therefore what you say is a belief, not a fact. Just because it was written a long time ago and a few prophecies have come true, does not mean it is the corner stone to all existence.

            What makes the bible any truer than holy books of all the other religions? Have you studied them? According to many of those books, you are going to hell. What is your reason to say the bible is true, and the others are false. Except for the fact that by mere chance you were born in a christian country.

            Simply quoting from the bible is completely invalid and pointless, since you have yet to show any evidence that those words are from a reliable or true source. You might as well quote from any book.

            I am not stuck in sins and pride. You are stuck in your fear. You may not realise it, but it is all consuming in you. You are not following god, you are simply obeying dogma. Hopefully you will free yourself one day.

            My final question would be, how do you know it is Gods word?

          • Steve smith

            There is only one question that you ask that needs to be answered.
            How do I know it is GOD’S WORD?

            That is easy. Everything written in it has been shown so far to be absolutely correct. All prophecies so far have come to pass exactly as they were written. The writings have withheld the test of time and have shown to be the same throughout history. Dead Sea Scrolls to the King Jame Bible have been exactly the same. Jesus Himself said that the old testament is the WORD and that it is correct to the point that HE was there not to destroy the law but to fulfill it. GOD said that HIS Word will stand forever. No other book can claim what the Bible can. It is the most important document ever in the history of the world.

            The scientific world has yet to prove the Bible wrong. The scientists of today are discovering that the Bible was right all along about everything it wrote about. Historians are daily discovering that GOD’S Word the Bible was absolutely correct about the history that the Bible writes about. The Bible talks about economics. History. Mathematics. It even talks about atoms and why it rains. It talks of the universe, the stars, space and so much more. It even talks of dinosaurs.

            You see, you are being deceived. GOD said that in the end times, many would be. HE wrote in the Bible about you! You are stuck in sin and pride. By saying you are not, that shows me that you are. We are all sinners and you are part of the “We”.

            Dogma is not what truth is. Truth is GOD’S Word. I follow only the Word of GOD. You may think differently, but that is not important at all. What you or I think matters not even a little.

            My hope is that you do find the truth and that one day I meet you in heaven and you will talk of the day that you found the truth and it was because of what we did here today. At least I can hope.

          • brieflycake

            So you chose to dodge/ignore all my points? Hardly sounds like a man in a strong position. More like someone desperately trying to keep a sinking ship afloat. They are in fact very important points because they completely undermine your position. But nevermind, I shall address what you have said:

            The whole prophecies coming true thing is not proof. Nostradamus made lots of apparently correct prophecies. Is he a god now?

            All the prophecies deal in vague language, and do not mention actual specifics. Therefore the words can be twisted to mean many things, because they’re not specific. Also, as far as I know the phophecies dont give specific dates at which they are set to come true. Therefore it is only a matter of time before they come true, thats just the law of chance. You’d think that if they were written by the almighty god of the entire universe he could give us some specifics.

            When will end times happen? You cant answer it. We keep getting told it is imminent. Its always been imminent. There is always a new excuse why it hasn’t happened.

            How do you know the bible isnt a test set you by God? To test if you can show free thought, critical thinking and true vision. Or if you will just believe everything it says unquestioningly, blindly. If that is so, you are failing it right now.

            You misunderstand the basic rules of proposed theories. It is not the scientists job to prove the bible wrong. It is YOUR job to prove it correct. Yes there are many historical facts in the Bible. Since when does that make it Gods word? It was written by men at the time of the events, so of course it contains historical data. You say it talks about mathematics and science etc. If it were released today as a science book, or maths book it would not get published, because it is shoddy and vague. Show me where the bible goes in depth into any of those subjects. Of course it doesnt. It probably just gives them a mention. If the Bible is gods word, how come our human modern day science books are of a much higher standard? With a far broader and more specific understanding of every aspect of science. Surely mere mortals cant be better at writing science books than God himself?

            I am not being deceived. I am open to the universe. You are closed down and frightened. You do not know love. You think you do, but you do not. I do not believe any just god would want you to be like this.

            I hope I find the truth too. And I hope you do as well.

          • Steve smith

            I choose to follow the WORD of GOD and refuse to offer pearls to the swine.

          • brieflycake

            Really? So unless someone agrees completely with what you say, then it is just ‘throwing pearls before swine’? How very convenient. My points showed your words to the farce that they are, so you conveniently do not address them. You can probably see that they are all valid points, to which you have no comeback. You keep saying WORD of GOD like some sort of shield against the truth. The truth will always penetrate, no matter how many layers of illusion you wrap around yourself.

            We may as well cease the conversation as it clearly isn’t going anywhere. Have a good day, and enjoy your life. And dont worry about hell, as it doesnt exist. Just be free!

          • Steve smith

            It’s not that they agree with me, it is that they agree with GOD. I have nothing to say about that. GOD says it all.
            Have a nice life.

          • brieflycake

            That is based on the false premise that it is gods word. It is not.

          • Steve smith

            And how in hell do you know this ? …..with the emphasis on hell

          • brieflycake

            Well I feel I have explained in my previous comments, but I shall summarize it:

            1. There is a total lack of evidence. I have explained why the ‘prophecies coming true’ point is not valid evidence. Even if it was, it would only be evidence and not PROOF (proof meaning conclusive evidence). True the bible is one of the most important books in the history of mankind. That still doesnt mean its the word of god. There were loads of religions. Christianity just happened to become the successful one, probably because Rome endorsed it, as they could see they could misuse it for power over people. Also, its only an important document in Christian regions. It wasnt important in Asia for example.

            2. There is a massive amount of evidence showing that large parts of the bible were in fact taken from ancient Egyptian religion.

            3. There is no point to hell. Nothing can be gained from it. No humane or decent being would send someone to eternal torture. Everyone can be forgiven, as long as they learn their lesson.

            Now, it is possible that it is the word of god, I cannot rule it out 100%, but neither can I rule out lots of things. Doesnt mean that they are therefore true.

            There is an old saying “Question Everything”. That is a far healthier approach to life that blindly accepting something, because someone or something threatens you will hell if you dont. I apologise if I have been rude to you at all, but I do genuinely want to help. I know you probably just think thats Satan talking, but its not. All I can say is surely if God is truly just he would want you to be inquisitive, exercise free thought and see things for yourself?

          • Steve smith

            You really don’t see very clearly…..GOD knows who will see the truth……many will not accept HIM. You unfortunately seem to be one who HE has given over to a reprobate mind. You choose not to see the truth and accept Jesus the Son of GOD as your savior. I wish that was not the case but as long as you are alive, there still is hope.

            I see evidence of GOD everywhere. You do not. That is a problem for you.

            You atheists are an amazing group. Always trying to convince others that all must hate GOD, the GOD that you say does not exist. Hating something that you think is not real is …..insane.

          • brieflycake

            You have made some vital errors. I already said Im not an atheist. I also see evidence of god all around us. That doesnt make the bible the correct account of God.

          • Steve smith

            Whatever fool. I quote GOD and you argue. That is a really foolish thing to do. Your argument is not with me but with GOD. Go argue with him……I bet you will lose every time.

          • Valy Ci

            your god made a man and a woman, then allowed for the dad to screw his own daughters to make humanity? you are delusional

          • Lulzenberg Blanco

            May science help you in the form of psycho-therapy.

            You poor, poor, lost, delusional being..

          • Steve smith


          • Steve smith

            Oh by the way……I fear nothing. I died in a car accident quite a few years ago and was brought back. I saw things that makes your argument against GOD a really dumb argument. I know the truth. You are just guessing. Have a nice life……because after this……you are not going to like it I am sad to say.

          • brieflycake

            You do fear. You fear everything. Its just so deep rooted you dont realise it. Lots of people have had out of body experiences and after death experiences. They do not all say it proves the bible correct. Are you saying your experience is correct and theirs is wrong? I can guarantee nothing in your experience objectively showed the bible to be correct. You CHOSE to interpret it that way. Just saying ‘I know the truth’ and ‘GODS WORD’ doesnt make it true. Thats just words.

            Your only defense is to say “You’re going to hell”. Cant you see what a classic defense mechanism that is? Some people invent a cult (christianity) and then as a way of preventing members questioning the status quo, they threaten them with hell. That is a profoundly evil thing to do. I hope you are proud of yourself. And dont say ‘Im not threatening you, god is’. No god isnt, you are. You do not represent god, nor does the bible.

          • Valy Ci

            I don’t hate god, because this creep does not exist

          • Steve smith

            The haters of GOD are also liars…so you are lying when you say you don’t hate GOD, because you do because you lie.

          • Valy Ci

            nonsense as usual

          • Steve smith

            Intelligence is nonsense to the very dull minded.
            Have a nice life because after this, yours will be hell.

          • Valy Ci

            you can not teach the unteachable…

          • Calvin Candie

            Funny if its “gods” word then why do stories on the bible contradict each other? Wouldn’t a perfect “god” make sure his word was straight and to the point? You have no proof whatsoever that the bible is “gods” word.

          • Steve smith

            The Biblical historic accounts do not contradict each other. Some of the accounts were written thousands of years apart and still are in concert with each other.

            You are mentioned in the Bible. 2 Peter 3:3 says “Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts”

            and this…..Psalms 14:1 “The fool hath said in his heart, [There is] no God. They are corrupt,
            they have done abominable works, [there is] none that doeth good.”

          • Steve smith

            GOD’S Word is straight and to the point. You just don’t seem to have the ability to understand HIM. Too bad for you.

          • Wayne Millett

            The dates in the Bible are not meant to be taken literally. Imagine God as living outside of time and that 6 days could be 6 billion years.
            He puts things in place and lets them evolve, this makes more sense than some “micromanaging” control freak who hovers over every detail of creation. It’s still part of a plan, just a more logical one. After all, “He was and He is and always will be”.

          • Steve smith

            The Bible is quite clear that GOD created the universe in 6 literal days.

            When someone tells you….”I will call you in a day”, Do you expect a phone call in 1,000 years? No! When the Bible says on the first day, GOD created the heavens and the earth, it was the FIRST DAY. Not the first billion years. The Bible is the WORD of GOD inspired into men to be written down. GOD would not confuse man by telling him a day is longer than 24 hours.

            The theory of evolution has no place in today’s world. To think that evolution can overcome the 2nd law of thermodynamics is laughable. Thing get worse over time, not better. Always have and always will.
            I’ve yet to buy an old set of tires and see them evolve into a new set as they get older. I’ve yet to buy a house and watch it fix itself as it got older. I have never seen a human get well as they age. To think that a single cell can morph into a massively complex male and female organisms is beyond lunacy! It has never been observed and has never been proven! Ever!

            The earth cannot be 6 billion years old. There is no physical evidence of that span of time. Where is the sediment of erosion that would be present in the mighty rivers of the world? The earth is moving away from the sun at a very constant rate. If the earth was 1 million years old, did you know that the earth would have been on the surface of the sun a million years ago? At the rate of erosion, the earth would today be as flat as a cue ball.

            The speed of light has changed since creation. The speed of light at creation was instantaneous. Since then, the speed of light has slowed down to where it is today. The speed of light was first accurately measured in the 1600’s. It has slowed from even then to where it is today. What does that mean?
            1. The galaxies and stars we see that are billions of light years away are indeed far away. But they were visible a the instant of creation.
            2. The breakdown of dating processes would be incorrect. The carbon 14 dating system would be wrong because the breakdown of carbon 14 cannot be proved to be constant. Same with all other nuclear breakdown dating systems.

          • Atra Hasis

            Because the Hebrews Stole these stories (plagiarists!), compressed and altered them to only make reference to one Lord God — THAT is the reason for the contradictions, especially regarding God’s apparent multiple-personality disorder, e.g. Creating and “loving” humans, then getting pissed when they don’t listen and deciding to kill them All with a Flood and Deluge — except for a small family and their several wives (THIS is how they could have repopulated – also open your small mind and consider that at such an earlier point in history, bloodlines would have been much purer, so ‘incest’ wouldn’t have had as dramatic and immediate effects such as we see today).

            Also, it’s evident if you actually READ (if you Can), that this was not a universal destruction of all living humans.
            [This is why they tried to make it all fit together when they changed All the narratives from MANY gods to just a singular Lord.]

            The ORIGINAL texts were polytheistic, containing a pantheon of gods, who were not always in accord.
            (Of course it wouldn’t make sense taking a narrative consisting of many characters, and trying to rewrite it with only a Single character!)

            Also, in these more ancient texts, the gods are described as actual physical beings who lived among their subjects.
            The Sumerians extensively recorded many aspects of their daily lives, just as the Egyptians did.

            There is also PROOF that many of the world’s “firsts” came from The Sumerian culture — the FACT is also known that today’s Bible, namely the Old Testament, was largely stolen from several earlier religions, primarily Sumerian texts.
            If you don’t know that the Bible has been Intentionally altered to serve the desires of rulers of the time – many times throughout history, you know NOTHING about the topic, and should sit tf down.

          • Calvin Candie

            Because you can’t explain something that’s not real, just admit it.

          • Steve smith

            You are not real. You are a figment of someone’s imagination. That is why no one can explain you. Odd………………

          • Calvin Candie

            So a talking snake was proven to be correct? Noah gathered all animals on the ark? How did he get Kangaroos? A virgin mother and a zombie prophet, a place you go to when your bad, sounds like nothing more than mans attempt to make people fear something and spend countless amounts of money on nothing. The bible has proven nothing, I can say the same thing about Harry Potter and make my agenda seem real.

          • Ranjith Vadiyala

            “If god is anything, then it is everywhere and in everything” – You said it perfect

          • Calvin Candie

            You sir have no evidence whatsoever to prove anything you have just spouted. Nothing in the bible has been proven true. Hey you need a crutch and a invisible person to tell you to be good that’s your business. You are a hypocrite you blindly believe what the bible says but you ask for anyone who don’t believe to prove it, you have no proof whatsoever what your saying is true, other that because “god” said so. Get over yourself and grow up the time for imaginary friends is long gone and its because of people like you this world hasn’t progressed more than it should.

          • Steve smith

            Uhm WRONG!……….the Bible was the first to say the earth was round and floated in space long before man discovered it was right. The Bible talks of atom….things so small they cannot be readily seen. A couple of thousand years later.. scientists discover atoms. It talks of why it rains….scientifically…..and it was not till a long time afterward that man learned why it rains. The historic references have been amazingly perfect as historic archaeologists find that Biblical references to ancient cities and events were written factually….and amazingly accurate.

            Prophecies were written in the Bible thousands of years previously came to pass…and the odds of that happening are so small that it almost cannot be calculated. Thousands of prophecies coming true and more coming true almost daily.

            So you seem to be wrong…a lot…….on probably almost everything in your life.

            Read the Bible and learn the truth….the truth will set you free.

          • Piyush Singh

            Steve Smith Sir,

            Please consider reading Srimad Bhagvatam here -> http://www.vedabase.com/en/sb. It was documented at least 5000 years ago (though it is timeless wisdom) and there are many predictions that proved true. Also it has detailed descriptions of Hell (even with details of many types of hells) and also detailed information on creation. Wish you best of luck.

            Thanks for your enthusiastic preaching Bible.

          • Steve smith

            Thank you. I am only doing what GOD tells us to do and that is the Great Commission telling everyone of the good news.

          • Tom C

            The Bible is clearly God’s Word if He is an idiot! It says that insects have 4 legs, and that bats are birds!

          • Ranjith Vadiyala

            Why is that God cannot control Satan? Is Satan more powerful than God? If so why not believe in more powerful Satan?

          • Steve smith

            GOD is infinitely more powerful than Satan.

            GOD allows Satan to do certain things. Did you know that for now, Satan is allowed in heaven? He is. GOD allows him in heaven to remind him of what he has lost. Eventually he will be thrown into the lake of fire for forever.

            Satan is allowed to do what he does so that GOD can see who will follow Satan or who will follow GOD. GOD does not want robots who blindly follow HIM (GOD). We all have free will and it is that free will that GOD gave us that gives GOD a chance to see how his creations (us) choose. GOD knows the future and the past. That being said, I believe that GOD, as powerful as he is, allows a little bit of surprise factor for HIM in our choices. A good choice by us is a pleasant surprise for GOD. I cannot really say that for sure as I can only go by what the Bible says about GOD.

            Satan has as much power as GOD allows him to have. Satan is being used by GOD to separate the wheat from the chaff.

          • Ranjith Vadiyala

            1. How can I differentiate between Satan and God? Is it not Gods responsibility to make the differentiation clear so that every one understands the difference? If it is God who failed to equip with the ability to differentiate between Satan and God, how can he punish me?

            2. Let me give you a scenario. Say I dont believe in God (I mean who ever you say God is), but never did any thing wrong and loved and helped a lot as much as I could and never did any harm to any. Will I still be sent to Hell for ever?

          • Steve smith

            Satan is all about death. GOD is all about love.

            GOD needs no criticism from you or anyone else. HE does as he pleases.

            We do not get to heaven on our own. Nothing we do or not do can get us there. We are all born sinners. Only one person in history (Jesus) was sinless.

            Jesus said in John 14:6 “Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”
            To get to heaven, you need Jesus. It is through Him that salvation is given. It is a free gift. All you need to do is accept it!

          • dan from ohio

            actually the correct wording is SHEOL,the abode of the dead,Jesus called it Abraham,s bossom

          • “Jesus” did not even exist until the middle of the 1600’s… prior to that it was “Iesus” (see 1611 Edition of Bible); the word “Iesus” is a Greek word that means ‘son of Zeus’…Any time a Greek word begins with “ie” it indicates sonship.

          • patriot156

            I’ts not people saying it it’s Gods word that says it. People are just repeating what it says. But God created us,and its been Satan since the fall has been at work trying to get us to not believe in the true god. His plan has always been of getting us to perverte his truth and to copy cat it into him being the one worshiped and not God. It’s always been us all to willing to let him do it to us too. We take his truth and perverte it into somethng very ugly, all while saying oh look were doing good that’s ok or theres many roads to good when in fact scripture doesn’t say no such a thing as there are many roads. That in itself fullfills the Temple prophecy of us acting as god saying we are god. Government does that as well BS to ROmans 13 worshipers for all thorughout scripture there is a theme that talks of God being the one and only king. ANd yet Satan uses Romans 13 to get us to beleive were doing good by paying taxes and doing what Ceasor says. BS to that crap. That statment of render to ceasor what is ceasors isn’t tellign us to pay taxes that was another way of Jesus telling us we can’t have two kings.
            Government is Idolotry because it’s created by our hands and replaces God as our protector.
            But throughout all that God stays by the sidelines tring to show us his love and goodness and being slow to anger, But yet we sin by dismissing him as some fairy tale or use false man made science to explain his world and say we came from monkeys and garbage. But again and agian hes long suffering trying every which way he can to get us to recognise he’s the one true god, and our creator. He in his love even sent a part of his existance His son Jesus to die for our sins and render Satans lie that there is no hope of eternal life other than what he’s going to give useless. He resurected from the grave, and from some of my reading while in Paradise not heaven but paradise which is another realm in the netherworld where the dead went at one time to free them.
            That is the point of his statement on the cross to the thief. THis day you will be with me in paradise.
            But he resurected which won the battle over satan by showing us we have eternal life regardless of how much we listened to sataans lies and yet we still say we dont believe and reject his word as truth so what other choice does he have? But he’s still waiting and hoping that people like you would come to see and giving you all kinds of chances. All one has ot do is believe first then have faith that whas was written is true and you will have eternal life, but time runs out and if you do not then what choice does he have. You tryign to make him out as a tyrant is listening to satans lies of how mean it is to put unbelievers in the lake of fire. But the trith is he’s giving you and other ample amount of time to do so.
            FYI to the stupid He isn’t about you being punished and in torment for millions and millions of years the punishing doesn’t last long but once it’s done and your no more. You dont feel or care your gone but that state lasts eternally not the anguish that’s been one of satans lies telling people they burn forever when they don’t crap.

          • brieflycake

            The problem is you speak of it so conclusively, when in fact there is no evidence or reason to believe it is true. Where is the evidence of Satan? The bible saying it doesnt make it true. Anyone can say anything, simply saying something doesnt make it true. Just because the bible gives an explanation, doesnt make it the only explanation or the best explanation. The problem is that all of this doesnt ring true in one’s soul. It is simply an intellectual construct.

          • patriot156

            Just you arguing with me makes you of satans doing and lies.
            Believe in what God says through me or not that’s your choice but when you’re standing in front of him outside the city arguing with him as you are now: remember this he gave you all you needed to know and plenty of chances it’s not his doing your destroyed but yours. Which actually goes along with one of my visions I had as a kid about this same subject. People arguing with god on the outside of the city saying why this and why that, and tryig to make it sound as if he’s the mean one, when in fact he gave more than enough evidence of his existance.

          • brieflycake


          • patriot156

            Must have hit the right buttons, but Satan is always trying to keep people from the truth is why.

          • brieflycake

            I dont feel you answered my question fully. Allow me to rephrase:

            1) Why does arguing with you make me of Satan’s lies? What are the reasons and what is the evidence? Im particularly interested in the evidence.

            2) Why would God want to follow him blindly, instead of questioning? Doesnt that make him a bad god?

            3) Why would God send us to hell for eternity regardless or whether we were good people or not simply because we didnt follow his book? Even a human being wouldnt condemn another to eternal torture.

            4) Why is the Bible God’s word? Again, I’d like reasons if you would be kind enough to provide them.

            5) Why is the bible correct, and the Islamic Quran wrong?

            I would love you to answer the questions fully, rather than just throwing a bible quote at them. You have yet to show the bible to be factual, so bible quotes are invalid to this discussion.

          • patriot156

            1. Since before the flood satan has been hard at work destroying God’s truth. He doesn’t mind people being religious
            as long as he can manipulate them. Satan knows his time is short so if he can stop gods truth his full truth from going out then
            he believes he has a chance to stop God from destroying him. satan has always been at work being and replacing God.
            Whats it say I will be like the most high. One of the best clues or proof as you say is during the dark ages the Catholic church
            never let people read the scripture themsleves as a means to control them. YOu arguing with me on this is you being a gatekeeper
            saying that only what you say or what has aleady been deemed good and nothing else or anyother knowledge keeps your belief in
            power and doesn’t allow another way of thinking to come to light because you are going out of your way to stop other such truths
            to be shown. To me then that is Satan working through you knowing I bring a bit more truth to the masses which he doesn’t want
            so he can prolong his torment here on earth.
            2.If you notice I never said that your the one who would because your saying it’s this way and none else. I said
            God wants us to question all scripture and not follow blindly.
            3.God doesn’t send people to hell for eternity that’s been a pagan fable brought in since Constantine and the formation of
            The Roman catholic church. What God does do is destroy Idoloters, unbelievers etc… completly. Meaning the second death isn’t
            what people think. The second death is the complete death of the soul. Meaning not just the body but a persons essence as well.
            I offer up The Last days series By Josepth A Cortes. they are a series of PDF File books that are completly downloadable online for free.
            He goes into the second death more than I can here. But God is not a man so his ways ae not ours. If he’s the creator
            then he has the right. (This goes along with your first question too!!)/ just the fact that all these stupid science fiction theories
            about God, Hell, Death, etcc proves my point that Satan doesn’t want God’s full truth being taught so he can manipulate
            people to begin with.
            4.The bible is Gods word because it is inspired by him through the authors. The authors again as I already stated didn’t just
            wake up and say “Today I’m going to make a manuscript to fool and manipulate mankind. God spoke to them and said hey I want you to
            write this down so future generations would know who I am and waht I fully wanted. After Cain killed able Cain I belive is the
            author of appostessy since he’s the one who said his face is, or will be hidden form him now. He went to work along with his dissendants
            to write false lies and deciept to muddle God and his goodness. So to counter that God need his own authors to write his word
            and need those of pure heart of who he could trust to not change wht he told them to write. He chose over 40 different authors
            over 1500 year time period because he also knew people like yourslef would claim well it’s easy to write one book all at one time
            in one place. So God choce different people in different countries and languages to write his word down, and make them agree with
            each other in such a way that even if someone like your self came along they would not be able to debunk the idea that it
            was written over 1500 years and other [people and still agree with Gods truth. So the bible is gods word because he’s
            telling us through other authors his true nature and Goodness. While true anyone could write about Zeus, or other God/s
            and write a story around it, but no mere human would be able to catch the spirit of the bible unless they were being inspired by God.
            5.This ones easy because the Quran was written by Mohamad who took excerpts from the Bible or Jewish Torah, and
            combined Moon God worship to bring in Allah. I agian refer to the last days series by Joseph A Cortes on this.

          • Sounds exactly how cult leaders teach. Believe what I say or else God will damn you… you’re of Satan… blah blah blah… same nonsense Arnold Murray did.

            Acts 17:11 commends the Bereans for questioning everything Paul did, and then going to look it up. Never once in the Bible does it say to just believe someone. That’s ignorant. In fact, I wrote an article about this subject.

            Top 7 Signs of A False Teacher


          • patriot156

            Fortson this was not your fight to begin with it was between me and Brieflycake. If you looked at his statements he’s of the Atheist demonination, and not of God. My arguement with him is God did indeed give us more than enough truth to beleive in him, and if you read my comments that is true if you beleive in God as well.
            Does it not say in scripture that those who deny Christ came in the flesh and died and was resurected are in fact the spirit of Antichrist?
            Does it not say in revelations that those who go in the lake of fire will be unbeleivers? If you look back on our converstaion it was him who jumped on to me because I believe in God and don’t believe in evolution. He said “that there is no reason to beleive in what the bible says or jsut because it says something doesn’t make it true”
            His words not mine. So you tell me how it’s wrong for me to defend the Gospol and say that what God said is true and can’t be refuted?
            Your just mad at me for my berating I gave you a whie back on your book of the Angels and on Cain. Breiflycake is an atheist and needs to know God word is true, and not some fable that’s what I was meaning and trying to say, and if you read what he and I did say you would know that instead of trying to attack me.

          • Christ is the English word for Christos, which is the Greek word for Krishna, which is a Hindu deity.

          • dan from ohio

            actually stone I can prove the Bible is true and accurate.The first book Genesis,a Jewish book,lists the name of the first man Adam,then it names his sons and their sons all the way to Noah,you know the one who built the ark .Now when you research all their names you will find encoded in them the CHRISTIAN Gospel of Jesus Christ.The christian Gospel encoded in a Jewish book 4000 years before the birth of Christ,I,ll stick with the Bible,God,s word.

          • James Cirrito

            That same list goes all the way to Jesus. That would make him be in Lineage with the Kings of Israel! Get it?

          • patriot156

            No the bible was inspired to man from God man only writ down what they were being told. Now man wrote in language, and terms they understood, but God was the one telling them what to write.
            These authors didn’t simply wake up one day and say Gee i’m going to write somethng down and fool people with No that’s not how it happened.
            The one thing that is amasing is there were 40 independant authors of the bible over several years and different countties and backgrounds. But yet they were all able to catch a certain theme throughout the ages. Some have said this time was over a 1500 year period That alone is a miricle that writers from differetn countries and time frames could gather the same message of God. No one in moder times coudl do that not 40 different people over the same period of time NO!
            Plus take in account the finding of the dead sea scrolls of which the book Of Isaiah is almost word for word the same you’d read today NO sir they did not just simply write it they were being lead by the Holy spirit to do so.

          • KimarieSings

            In that case, you must concede that there are stories that are very similar to the ones in your bible that can be traced back to hundreds of years BEFORE anything written in that time period. If anything the bible is simply a retelling of the ancient egyptian myths based on the signs of the zodiac, just updated with current names and places of their current time(2000 years ago). I encourage you to do some research into what I am saying.

          • teller123

            The bible can be proven Daniel easily proves the bible. Again don’t believe what you’ve been told study it for youself. You read it and pick several other sources to understand what you don’t understand. Verify all the proven history from that one book doing your own study. The original Greek and or Hebrew text is very helpful. Tons of free videos and other sites that can help.

          • Brad Mk

            none of that is true proof because I have done the research, read the bible,twice, and I am only less convinced. I wasn’t there, I did not witness it, it is circumstantial. We get bombarded with new information about WWII all the time, I know people that were there during the event being excavated, had no clue about what was discovered. Daniel proves nothing, he is dead, if he ever was real. Your existence right now at this second is a perception at best, if there was no light or sound all you would be is a scent and a sensation, reality for many disabled people. You have no proof.

          • dan from ohio

            lets not forget the bible talks about the fiery flying serpent…

          • patriot156

            On this issue you are correct but they didn’t all die off after the flood, because accounts of dinasaurs have been written in the 1500’s as well. Also the Giants didn’t all die off because David slew Goliath, and that was after the flood.

          • Giants died off. Read how they were created in the first place. Angels having sex with human women… the pagan cultures had the same stories of the gods sleeping with human women… modern times people claim “aliens” are taking human women. Same story, different time.

            The giants returned after the flood because other angels started sleeping with human women in smaller number. The original angels that did it were punished.

          • patriot156

            Not all did Goliath and his cousin were well over 9-15 ft tall and I never said they didn’t so yes I know angels slept with women that’s not the point the point is some Giants survived or else we would not have Goliath.

          • Wrong… again, angels AFTER the flood took women, so therefore Goliath existed. We don’t need giants to survive the flood in order to still have giants. We only need fallen angels and human women after the flood to make new giants.

          • patriot156

            No I dont’ think so it’s what I beleive and have read enough to know of what I talk about. If that’s what you believe then so beit not going to argue.

          • patriot156

            Genises 6 says there were Giants in the land in that time AND after meaning after the flood. Maybe to some degree but no they didn’t all die off because some were able to survive. there are flood reports from all over the world in differetn religions Pagans included It seems fair to beleive that other people other than Noah survived even if the bible doesn’t mention it. Notice the bible leaves out lots of stuff. Not really trying to argue just saying Just because somethign isnt’ mentioned doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. ALso in the Book of ENoch it does actually make it seem that some Giants survived. That could mean that Dinausaurs survived as well afterwards since some accounts talk about it. Job which is after the Flood talks about Dragons and leviathon etc these had to be Dinasaurs that survived.

          • Wrong… they all died in the flood. What don’t you get about how giants were created? Angels (sons of God) took human women before the flood. Then a different group took women after the flood… thus we have giants both before and after the flood. None survived.

          • Darryl FukThat Boyd

            so if angels slept with women how do we know Jesus is not lucifers son who what evidence do we have he is really gods

          • Same evidence we have that he wasn’t Joseph’s.

          • manley

            Man are you messed up..Angel having sex..gmafb!!

          • stone

            what about the anniukia

          • Annunaki

          • patriot156

            actually it does they call them dragons in the bible and or leviathon etc..

          • teller123

            Yep the bible does in fact describe creatures that would appear to be dinosaurs. Not in a place I can look it up right now but there is one verse in particular that describes the tail of a very large creature as being the size of a tree trunk. Naysayers have said this verse is about an elephant or rhino. Really? When did either have a tail the size of a tree trunk. Footprints of man and dinosaur have been found and tons of pottery and drawings found of men and dinos. “My people will perish for lack of knowledge”. Please study for yourself. Pick just one or two books and thoroughly study them. Your soul is so, so important. CHUCK MISSLER has an excellent study of Genesis online. Or Daniel or Revelation. Pick one and take the time. Will pray you find truth.

          • The word “dinosaur” was invented after the Bible was written. Also, the Bible does talk about a lot of large and strange animals. One is Leviathan. A large, scaled, sea dwelling creature, that struck fear in the hearts of men and had scales so tough that no weapon could pierce it.

            There was also Behemoth. It’s tale is described as being as large as a tree. So just because you don’t see the word “dinosaur” doesn’t mean they aren’t talked about.

          • Steven Schmohl

            Steve Smith,you sir speak the absolute truth. God Bless you sir.

          • Jeremy

            Such a narrow dogmatic view you seem to have Steve. There is more more to the story than the bible, and many preconceived notions that will need to be changed in all of us. The books are not what connect us. It’s all in ourselves, in the stillness.

          • Steve smith

            I doubt you even know what dogmatic means. I bet you think it is a car that uses dogs to shift gears….thus being dogmatic.

          • Atra Hasis

            You ARE aware that most of the Old Testament was ripped off from various other, even more ancient texts? Creation, the Flood and Deluge, the Hero of the Flood, Adam (Adamah, Adamu, Adapa, Lu-Lu), The Trinity, the Saviour/Messiah, and the list goes on.
            Not to mention most versions of the Bible available today are translations of translations of translations, etc., and perhaps ironically, the New World Testament (used by the Jehovah’s Witnesses) IS THE MOST ACCURATE BIBLE IN EXISTENCE! —and that’s a FACT, not an opinion. It was translated almost entirely from the texts’ original language manuscripts, in Hebrew as well as Greek.
            Also available is a word-for-word encyclopedic reference supporting their interpretations which led to certain word choices where numerous options were available.

            This Bible also has much scientifically accurate information, and DOES NOT claim the Earth is just a few millennia old; rather the opposite.

            A few (of many) scientifically sound and verified passages:

            “There is One who dwells above the *circle of the Earth*.” – Isaiah 40:22 (confirmation that the Earth was ROUND, Loooooong before ‘conventional’ history “proved” this);

            “All the streams flow into the sea, yet the sea is not full. To the place from which the streams flow, there they return so as to flow again.” – Ecclesiastes 1:7 (knowledge of the hydrologic cycle of Earth);

            He stretches out the northern sky over empty space, *suspending the earth upon nothing*.” – Job 26:7″

            “… My spirit will not tolerate man indefinitely, because he is only flesh. Accordingly, *his days will amount to 120 years.” – Genesis 6:3 (is not 120 years roughly the maximum age at which the oldest living people in the world reach, even today?)

            There are mentioned in the Bible many people, places, and events, that have been verified by archaeology and corroborating contemporary accounts from a variety of sources.
            Further, no historical figure/location has ever been Disproven as of yet.
            There have even been found evidence of the parting and crossing of the Red Sea, believe it or not — equine and human remains, along with chariots and their wheels, scattered along a rough path from shore out to sea – on Both sides of the Red Sea…

            I could go on and on… 😛

          • Steve smith

            Wrong. The supposed ancient texts used Biblical facts to deceive many.

            It was the Bible that first came out with things and then the evil ones used the Bible to deceive those who want to be deceived. The Bible had the first story of the flood as the one who wrote the Bible….GOD…..not only wrote the Bible but also made the Bible historic fact in all the accounts of history in it. Satan then used the Bible to deceive those who are open to deception. Jesus spoke of the Old Testament. He said he came to verify and not destroy. Jesus was not a liar. He spoke truth. He is GOD.

            To quote Dr. Warren Fingeroot……People believe what they want to believe. The various versions are not the Bible….the King James Bible is perfect to the Dead Sea Scrolls…..which is impossible except for GOD. The Bible has no copyright. Anything else that has a copyright is not the Bible. JW’s are far from Biblical teachings. They are a cult.

            As far as the JW’s go…..here are some things that are apostate:

            Christ is not equal to God because He is a creature.

            Christ was first of God’s creations

            Christ died on a stake, not a cross

            Christ was raised from the dead as an immortal spirit person

            Christ’s presence is in spirit

            Kingdom under Christ will rule earth in righteousness and peace

            Kingdom brings ideal living conditions to earth

            Earth will never be destroyed or depopulated

            God will destroy present system of things in the battle at Har-Magedon

            Wicked will be eternally destroyed

            The human soul ceases to exist at death

            Hell is mankind’s common grave

            Only a little flock of 144,000 go to heaven and rule with Christ

            The 144,000 are born again as spiritual sons of God

            These teachings go against what GOD says. JW’s are following religion and not GOD. If you are a JW, then I pray that the GOD of the Universe makes you see the truth before it is too late.

          • Actually, none of the Bible was ripped off at all. If you actually bothered to read the Bible you’d know that Abraham was from Ur (Uruk, modern Iraq), which was located in Babylon.

            It is one of the oldest cultures on earth, and they knew how to write. According to the Bible, it was the great grandson of Noah (Nimrod) that founded Babylon.

            Do you think Noah and his sons would’ve passed on the story of the flood? Of course they did. Over time, just like the game telephone, some things changed.

            As people spread out over the earth, they took stories of the flood with them. That doesn’t mean anyone copied anyone else… especially since there are over 500 flood stories all over the world, but nobody claims Native Americans copied/stole their version. Nobody claims people from India stole their version.

            It’s not a stolen story. It’s a story that was passed down from the survivors and has survived into modern times. I wrote a book on the subject and dissected the origins, and details of Noah’s flood. 442 pages long. Rated 4.9 out of 5 stars on Amazon.


          • Darryl FukThat Boyd

            BIBLE says all of the cultures you just mentioned with similar stories are basically damned because they dont believe in Jesus. Yet they somehow heard of stories from the bible like the flood and just insert their own bits and pieces to make them their own… makes no sense

          • Mel

            Cultures and traditions….. they are like a historical version of the children’s game telephone. I could take a tree lizard back throughout history and in different parts of the earth and ask people to describe this same lizard. Each description will be different. God (our Creator) has had many different descriptions and names through out history. Still the same creator though 😉 perception is a double edge sword that can bring people together and/or divide them

          • Aset Nicole

            mid 1800’s because it was then that archeologists first discovered the remains of the ancient civilization of Sumer. The subsequent wealth of hitherto unknown records meticulously documented on, not hundreds or thousands, but tens of thousands of clay tablets uncovered by archeologists that were compiled by the scribes of this ancient culture has since astounded Archeologists, Theologians and scholars alike. The Ancient civilization of Sumer existed in the area of the Persian Gulf that was once known as Mesopotamia (now southern Iraq). The Sumerian writings are perhaps the oldest record of an actual civilization that we have any real knowledge of and, through clay tablets, cylinder seals and stele, the Sumerians have provided us with a graphic and richly detailed version of mans early histories including the story of creation, both of the earth and of man. The texts also tell us of fierce and devastating wars fought over the possession and control of the Earths resources that ultimately led to the utter destruction of the Sumerian civilization.

          • Tom C

            Try reading the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, and then Judges 19 and try to say the Biblical writers didn’t steal stories from other writers!

          • brian

            you need to get your facts right. what you are saying is totally wrong.
            Known by most universities and scholars the bible is the most support literary book in the world. It not translations of translation. It is supported by humam word, dead sea scrools and many other artifacts that support it truth. Including one generation of people that confirmed its writting, passed on the writtings and refered to orginal works. There is no literay book in the world that has been written even beowolf, that has support for it truth. So check your facts or check with scholars before you make your statement.

          • Thomas Loscar

            IF… it weren’t for the FACT that the scriptures of the holy bible being re-arranged and having entire books removed from the bible I might have agreed with you. In the 3rd century a.d. then Emperor Constantine gathered all the local church leaders from various Christian faiths in order to compile a different bible by only allowing that which ALL those leaders could accept and agree on, Constantine claimed it was Gods will when in fact it was more a political move on his part because it was easier to control the masses when all their beliefs were in sync with one another. Please, don’t take my word for it, do your own research. Be, blessed.

          • Aset Nicole Kotrick

            Please go and recheck and research with a more open minded, positive, optimistic and quick to know things that are not as much fact as you would wish!

            You do not have to study the truths you believe true. Go and read and research all of the Ancient Sumerian texts (not the Babylonian)e Sumerian culture, which can be traced as far back as the beginning of the Fourth Millennium BC, was the source of all the myths of Middle Eastern civilizations that followed, such as the Akkadian, Babylonian, and Assyrian people who inherited much of the Sumerian culture. This culture was subsequently transferred to the west to the lands of Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, and Anatolia.

            The actual language of the Sumerians was superseded rather early by Akkadian, a Semitic tongue. Sumerian is non-Semitic and its origins are unknown. It seems to have no affinities at all and to have suddenly appeared on Earth out of nowhere. The Akkadians and Sumerians later intermingled and eventually formed a fusion of the two languages. From this Sumerian-Akkadian milieu evolved the Semites and eventually the Hebrews or Jews. The Hebrews did not invent their language or literary forms – their culture was inherited from the older Mesopotamian and Canaanite cultures.

            It should be more widely realized that when those famous Biblical figures Noah and Abraham lived, there was no such thing as a Hebrew in existence. Both the Jews and Arabs traditionally claim descendancy from Abraham who was neither Jew nor Arab but a resident of the city of Ur in Mesopotamia.

            The earliest reference in the Old Testament said to show Abraham’s alleged Hebrew ancestry is an error perpetuated by mistranslation. In their eagerness to prove Hebrew antiquity, translators have incorrectly referred to Abraham as such in Genesis 14.

            The context in which this reference appears is the invasion of the eastern kings into Canaan and Abraham’s reaction when his nephew Lot is taken prisoner. As the text goes,

            “The invaders seized all the possessions of Sodom and Gomorrah and all their food, and departed, taking with them Lot, the son of Abram’s brother, together with his possessions; he had been living in Sodom. A fugitive brought the news to Abram the Hebrew who was camping at the terebinths of Mamre the Amorite, kinsman of Eshkol and Aner, these being the confederates of Abram.”

            Evidently, Abraham (Abram) was a stranger in the land at the time; he had just migrated from the city of Ur in Mesopotamia. Manifestly both he and Lot were visitors or travellers. The translation of the word “ibri” as “Hebrew” has no linguistic support. The root “br” means “to pass through or to cross.” Hence, “ibri” as it appears in the text of Genesis would mean one who is passing through or a visitor. In reality, the news was brought to Abraham that his nephew, his friend and fellow-traveller, had been captured by the invaders.

          • vampire8

            Actually the Lamsa bible was translated from Aramaic which is even purer.

          • patriot156

            Your wrong is saying that someone who beleives in a longer time span than 6k years doesn’t believe in GoD. I fully beilieve in God and I beleive in the scriptures as written, but its peoples interpretation that gets sketchy. Me I try not to let what i’ve heard before or what other preacher has said when reading scripture which is impossible almost but still, but As I stated before I can’t put all of what happens in a tiny little 6k year timeframe. I fully belive that God parted the Red sea. I fully believe that adam live 900+ years and so on but this article is about a foot print that is found in several thousand year old dirt and another picture does show a giant foot print of which the bible Genisis six does say there were giants in the land.
            So don’t equate that a different beleif than what you believe in or what you’ve been told isn’t of god because I’ve been researching this stuff since 1996 at least since I’ve been born again and most certainly do believe in God probably much more so than you do.
            And no don’t let someone tell you that to believe in more than 6k years means were combining evolution and creation for even if others do I certainly don’t.

          • Steve smith

            We are not to bring our own understanding to the Bible as it is very clear what it means. The Bible is not Bill Clinton and never says “It depends what the meaning of IS is.”

            GOD can do anything and 6.5K years is plenty to do what is now here.

            I go by what the Bible says and Jesus spoke of heaven. He said in John 14 : 6 “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” I believe HIM.

            The lie of Evilution is Satan’s attempt to cast doubt on the Word of GOD. No apes ever became man and no animal evolved from a chemical soup. That is all nonsense. Creation happened in 6 days as the Bible says.

            You cannot possibly say that you believe more than anyone. That is a sign that you are proud and no one has a right to be proud. Vanity was the first sin.

          • patriot156

            Nothing I said is out of context with the bible, for I too go by what it says. But when you read the prophecy’s that speak of teachers not teaching the truth and false religion and false Christs, one has to wonder of when, who, and where he is speaking of. One has to conclude that people from that time to now, have been spreading lies and deciept about Gods word. SO would that not include most of the already established churches? When Jesus made the claim 2000+ years ago of many turnning asside form sound doctern and such do you not think that has already happened, and not something that is to happen? When he told the people you are of your father Satan wouldn’t you think then that most people regardless would be doing the will of satan even when they speak of Jesus? WHich has already had 2k years to do so? So when scripture talks about a rising beast, and rising Fals appostle don’t think that has already risen through mainsteam contemporarry teaching, rather than something to wait on or look for? Why else woudl we have reformations like Martin Luther if individules can not read the bible, and come to some understanding that may infact go against the established accepted church?
            I make that claim because of what it says about seeing god! Those who are of pure heart will see. Don’t you think that means someone reading Gods word with a pure heart and a thirst for truth or Knowledge couldn’t pick that out on his own? So your answer is to rely on everything a preacher tells you is that it and not do your own research? God doesn’t want to to follow a mans teaching but to do his own research and follow that even if it makes him alone. Which by what your saying makes me. I fully assure you I am not going outside of Gods word, but may be going outside of man! Do you not think that in the end times when it says that many will be going to and fro and increasing in knowledge that might just mean someone like myself coming along filled with the holy spirit and trying to undo the confusion that’s been out there for more than two Millenia?
            Look one of the prophecys says that Gods truth has to be taught which I claim in fullness it has not been so I have to clear up that and teach it. Nothing I have taught even invokes evolution but denounces it altogether. I simply say that mankind may not have been around for the millions of years as evolution states, and definatly didn’t come from monkeys, but most certainly didn’t start in 4004bc as mainstream teaches.
            Also were not waiting on a false prophet to arise since as I stated that false prophet has already risen, I’m only trying to undo his damage. Paul saying that Satan rises as an angel of light doesn’t mean me or what I’m tring to say it means what has already been taught and what has already rose. That’s how you should be reasing scripture instead of looking to a future time but look to what’s already been taught. Especially when it was written and fortold that appostesy had already been on the rise already.
            He said that Antichrist has already risen not will rise or going to, but is already at work in the world. THat was during Pauls time already so he’s had 2k years to do so.
            Pride has nothing to do with what I say or do, but trying to fullfil gods work here on earth inorder to undo thousands of yers of satans doing.
            Also satan is the copycat which means anything that is going on now is of his doing not Gods, at least not what he’s want. Meaning God may have put it in motion, or prophecied it but other than that he wouldn’t want those things to happen. But the point is Satan is into everything in this world anything that makes people think they are worshiping god but in reality are worshiping him. So with that in mind wouldn’t that alos include Religion and anythign they teach to dislusion the people into thinking they are doing good? Especially since they listen to you and not do their own research?
            If your so right, and so wrong then why is it many are called but few are chosen? Or how about the claim many will say Lord Lord but wont be chosen. or get away form me those that work iniquity I knew you not. What would you thing that means? It means that many people will be doing what they think is gods work but weren’t. Which goes along with the many shall persecute you in my name.
            Or how about the Romans 14 claim that if one eats bitter herbs but the other doesn’t but both do so in the name of the lord why judgest? Or the one man regards the day but the other doesn’t why judge FYI this is talking about saturday or sunday WOrship. When God told Daniel to shutt up the books he was telling him that the meanings to his prophecy’s woudl not be known until the time of the end, and that time came to and end when Israel reclaimed their own land.
            I never said he didn’t do it in 6days but those 6days may not have been litteral 24hr periods they could of been 6thousand years.
            One of the Books I’ve read is called adam and the cave or something. It tells about the Garden of Eden and adam fall. But it goes on to tell about how god told adam that he’d let him back in the garden after five days, but after five days adam was mad but God told him then that when he said five days he meant 5,000 years so….
            The book of Jubilees talks about How Methusalah didn’t even live one full day in Gods eye which is talking about the day is but a thousand years. God doesn’t keep time the way we do hence why were not immortal any more.
            The stone that stirked Nebachanessars Idol is Gods word and truth which is what I’m trying to do. If I sit around waiting for someone else to do it it wont get done!

          • Ranjith Vadiyala

            If Bible is 100% true then we also should believe that Earth is FLAT. Do you think so?

          • Steve smith

            The Bible never says the earth is flat. Here are some Bible information that you probably missed.

            1. Only in recent years
            has science discovered that everything we see is composed
            of invisible atoms. Here, Scripture tells us that the
            “things which are seen were not made of things
            which do appear.”

            2. Medical science has only
            recently discovered that blood-clotting in a newborn
            reaches its peak on the eighth day, then drops. The
            Bible consistently says that a baby must be circumcised
            on the eighth day.

            3. At a time when it was
            believed that the earth sat on a large animal or a giant
            (1500 B.C.), the Bible spoke of the earth’s free
            float in space: “He…hangs the earth upon nothing”
            (Job 26:7).

            4. The prophet Isaiah also
            tells us that the earth is round: “It is he that
            sits upon the circle of the earth” (Isaiah 40:22).
            This is not a reference to a flat disk, as some skeptic
            maintain, but to a sphere. Secular man discovered this
            2,400 years later. At a time when science believed that
            the earth was flat, is was the Scriptures that inspired
            Christopher Columbus to sail around the world (see Proverbs
            3:6 footnote).

            5. God told Job in 1500
            B.C.: “Can you send lightnings, that they may go,
            and say to you, Here we are?” (Job 38:35). The
            Bible here is making what appears to be a scientifically
            ludicrous statement—that light can be sent, and
            then manifest itself in speech. But did you know that
            radio waves travel at the speed of light? This is why
            you can have instantaneous wireless communication with
            someone on the other side of the earth. Science didn’t
            discover this until 1864 when “British scientist
            James Clerk Maxwell suggested that electricity and light
            waves were two forms of the same thing” (Modern
            Century Illustrated Encyclopedia).

            6. Job 38:19 asks, “Where
            is the way where light dwells?” Modern man has
            only recently discovered that light (electromagnetic
            radiation) has a “way,” traveling at 186,000
            miles per second.

            7. Science has discovered
            that stars emit radio waves, which are received on earth
            as a high pitch. God mentioned this in Job 38:7: “When
            the morning stars sang together…”

            8. “Most cosmologists
            (scientists who study the structures and evolution of
            the universe) agree that the Genesis account of creation,
            in imagining an initial void, may be uncannily close
            to the truth” (Time, Dec. 1976).

            9. Solomon described a “cycle”
            of air currents two thousand years before scientists
            “discovered” them. “The wind goes toward
            the south, and turns about unto the north; it whirls
            about continually, and the wind returns again according
            to his circuits” (Ecclesiastes 1:6).

            10. Science expresses the
            universe in five terms: time, space, matter, power,
            and motion. Genesis 1:1,2 revealed such truths to the
            Hebrews in 1450 B.C.: “In the beginning [time]
            God created [power] the heaven [space] and the earth
            [matter] . . . And the Spirit of God moved [motion]
            upon the face of the waters.” The first thing God
            tells man is that He controls of all aspects of the

            11. The great biological
            truth concerning the importance of blood in our body’s
            mechanism has been fully comprehended only in recent
            years. Up until 120 years ago, sick people were “bled,”
            and many died because of the practice. If you lose your
            blood, you lose your life. Yet Leviticus 17:11, written
            3,000 years ago, declared that blood is the source of
            life: “For the life of the flesh is in the blood.”

            12. All things were made
            by Him (see John 1:3), including dinosaurs. Why then
            did the dinosaur disappear? The answer may be in Job
            40:15–24. In this passage, God speaks about a
            great creature called “behemoth.” Some commentators
            think this was a hippopotamus. However, the hippo’s
            tail isn’t like a large tree, but a small twig.
            Following are the characteristics of this huge animal:
            It was the largest of all the creatures God made; was
            plant-eating (herbivorous); had its strength in its
            hips and a tail like a large tree. It had very strong
            bones, lived among the trees, drank massive amounts
            of water, and was not disturbed by a raging river. He
            appears impervious to attack because his nose could
            pierce through snares, but Scripture says, “He
            that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.”
            In other words, God caused this, the largest of all
            the creatures He had made, to become extinct.

            13. Encyclopedia Britannica
            documents that in 1845, a young doctor in Vienna named
            Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis was horrified at the terrible death
            rate of women who gave birth in hospitals. As many as
            30 percent died after giving birth. Semmelweis noted
            that doctors would examine the bodies of patients who
            died, then, without washing their hands, go straight
            to the next ward and examine expectant mothers. This
            was their normal practice, because the presence of microscopic
            diseases was unknown. Semmelweis insisted that doctors
            wash their hands before examinations, and the death
            rate immediately dropped to 2 percent. Look at the specific
            instructions God gave His people for when they encounter
            disease: “And when he that has an issue is cleansed
            of his issue; then he shall number to himself even days
            for his cleansing, and wash his clothes, and bathe his
            flesh in running water, and shall be clean” (Leviticus
            15:13). Until recent years, doctors washed their hands
            in a bowl of water, leaving invisible germs on their
            hands. However, the Bible says specifically to wash
            hands under “running water.”

            14. Luke 17:34–36
            says the Second Coming of Jesus Christ will occur while
            some are asleep at night and others are working at daytime
            activities in the field. This is a clear indication
            of a revolving earth, with day and night at the same

            15. “During the
            devastating Black Death of the fourteenth century, patients
            who were sick or dead were kept in the same rooms as
            the rest of the family. People often wondered why the
            disease was affecting so many people at one time. They
            attributed these epidemics to ‘bad air’
            or ‘evil spirits.’ However, careful attention
            to the medical commands of God as revealed in Leviticus
            would have saved untold millions of lives. Arturo Castiglione
            wrote about the overwhelming importance of this biblical
            medical law: ‘The laws against leprosyin Leviticus
            13 may be regarded as the first model of sanitary legislation’
            (A History of Medicine).” Grant R. Jeffery, The
            Signature of God With all these truths revealed in Scripture,how
            could a thinking person deny that the Bible is supernatural
            in origin? There is no other book in any of the world’s
            religions (Vedas, Bhagavad-Gita, Koran, Book of Mormon,
            etc.) that contains scientific truth. In fact, they
            contain statements that are clearly unscientific.

          • Ranjith Vadiyala

            Namaste Steve. Thanks for your very long reply

            1. Had Bible/Christianity/Church been so conducive to science, why is there always a fight between Science and Christianity? (Google for this and you will end up finding lakhs of web pages)
            (Conflicts between scientists like Galileo and Church are known to all)

            2. It is well know that the European movement known as ‘Enlightenment’ was a prolonged attack on the Christian edifice in order to allow free scientific inquiry and clip the wings of the politically powerful clergy. Christianity lost this fight against science. What was the need for such a thing at the first place had Bible/Christianity/Church been compatible with the science
            3. What was the reason for Templeton foundation to conduct world conferences on science and religion since at least 2003 (may be even earlier)?
            4. What is the logic/rationale/science behind Christianity’s claim that if you don’t trust Jesus/His Father (True God?), then you will be punished with eternal damnation? How does this central claim of Christianity stands reason or science?
            5. When, Nicene Creed, the most central of the History-Centric Christianity, is the most illogical and un-scientific, how can you say that Christianity is compatible with science
            Can you please answer the above questions?
            Thanks in advance

          • Steve smith

            Many who resent GOD and love death will fight to try to destroy the truth of the WORD of GOD. Their main goal is to deceive people into not believing the WORD.

            The Bible says in Matthew 24:35 “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”
            Science books change almost daily as things the Bible talks about are re-discovered. The Word of GOD has not changed, ever.

            The religious leaders of Europe in those days were corrupt and as I have said in the past, GOD is not religion and religion is not GOD. Man will use GOD to try to control others and so things like the catholic church, the Lutheran church or jehova’s witness or many other religious organizations were formed. These man made dogmatic religions are there to make money and control people.

            The Templeton foundation, founded by John Templeton, is an attempt to use the wealth that Mr. Templeton had as a way to spread the word of GOD. By making grants, Templeton thought that science will come to the conclusion that the Bible is truth. In many instances, that is exactly what happened.
            He even gave monies to atheists so they could possibly come to the truth of the WORD. After his death, the Templeton foundation still gives grants for scientific studies.

            The idea of punishment for not believing is logical. If you do not believe that gravity exists and jump off a bridge, the truth of gravity will hit you pretty hard. We all know that the choices we make result in consequences. Why would we exempt ourselves from that very construct when we choose to reject GOD?

            Science is a religion too. Religion is not GOD. Both are constructs of man. What science do you believe? The science of 1000 years ago? Or how about the science of 200 years ago? Or maybe the science of last year? Science seems to change almost daily. Science requires belief as much as religion does. Science has changed, the man made religions have changed while the WORD of GOD has not. When talking about science, religion and the WORD of GOD, we are talking about three different things.

            The Nicene Creed is a mainstay document of the catholic church. The catholic church is a religion. Again, religion is not GOD. The catholic church has been damned and is right now involved in creating a one world religion which goes against the teachings of GOD. It is involved in pedophilia and the criminal banking system.

            I hope this answers those questions.

          • Ranjith Vadiyala

            Namaste Steve. Thanks for your details answer. Please see my comments below

            1. You seem to suggest that science dont say the same things every day. You are right in some sense, not completely though. But then what is the need for you to defend Christianity by saying it complies with science?

            2. Its good to know that you oppose institutionalization of Christianity. If I got your wrong, please let me know

            3. Islam also tells the same thing. It also teaches every one to believe in the teachings of Quran. I am neither a Christian nor a Muslim. Whom should I trust now and why? Because, both claim that if you dont believe you will be sent to the hell for ever.

            4. I am ready to believe the the Word of GOD, but what is that Word of God? There are so many claims with no proofs. How will I know which one is the Word of God?

          • Steve smith

            Science will comply with GOD’S word and not vice versa. GOD’S Word never changes. Science is always changing and it is always in accordance with the Bible.

            I do oppose any institutional religion.

            Islam is not truth. There are no prophecies in the Koran that came true except that Mohammed would go to Mecca. Islam made a pact with the Nazi’s in WWII. So did the Catholics. They are apostate and always will be.

            There are over 1800 prophecies in the Bible that came true exactly as they were predicted often thousands of years previously. There are scientific references which science is just now discovering in the Bible that the Koran does not have.

            Islam is a religion of conquest. Belief in GOD / Jesus is a choice. Notice I do not say catholic religion or any man made organized Christianity.

            The way to tell what is the Word of GOD is by asking the Holy Spirit for understanding. The Word of GOD cannot be copyrighted. Any supposed bible that has a copyright is not the bible at all.
            You can tell by truth. The truth is contained in the old Hebrew texts and Greek writings. The Dead Sea Scrolls shows that the King James Bible follows exactly the oldest writings.

            You will know what is the Word of GOD by reading it!

          • You’re referring to Catholics, not Christians. Christians do not consider themselves to be Catholics. We do not hold the same doctrines or beliefs. So when you claim the “church” has been at odds with science, your statement is false.

          • The Bible doesn’t say the earth is flat. In fact, it specifically says its ROUND… if you’re talking about the phrase “4 corners of the earth”, it refers to North, East, South, and West… the 4 directions.

            I guess stupid people will come along in 2,000 years and claim with thought we really had a Sunrise and Sunset… we know the sun doesn’t really rise or set, but that’s language. It doesn’t have to be literal and specific for it to work.

          • Mel

            It also states not to trust man/woman because he/she was born in sin. Perception is the key and the bible was written and constructed by man and his perceptions. The 10 commandments were not established by man’s perception but as the law of humanity. Jesus spoke that the first two were the most important and the rest would fall into place. It is amazing to find out that those two commandments are incorporated into most religions while the rest of the teachings are based around time period traditions and cultures. God (our creator) works in mysterious ways for all of his children to live with spirituality while following His laws. Remember God was a bit disheartened when some of his people “needed” a king on Earth…. He then put David in that position…. that is when the spiritual perception of a religious king for those people started (not saying it did not happen…. I am saying God answered their prayers). Just like he answers the prayers of all people around the world based on their perceptional needs and understanding. I do not believe that my Father in Heaven would send his children to eternal damnation for the lack of understanding in other culture’s perceptions of Him and his existence. Just my “perception”

          • Tom C

            The Bible says that insects have four legs, and that bats are birds! Don’t try to say that the Bible is a science textbook!

          • Matt Welford

            All it is a a kids story book the got way out of hand…

          • Yeah… 500+ stories around the world… but people are saying Bill Cosby is guilty with only 20 or so women testifying… so why shouldn’t we have the same standard for convicting criminals as you do for calling it a “kid’s story?”

            If 500 cultures aren’t enough, let’s throw out eyewitness testimony if less than 500 people testify.

          • ww_blanka

            The Law of One-books are great and contain all that you mentioned.

          • Steve smith

            ET needs to phone home. If he had a smart phone, then he would have done that already.

      • Valy Ci

        oh my, this is so stupid it hurts. There is no god. If he existed, he should rott in jail for all the pain is causing…still…

        • Miles Prower

          God loves us , so he also gave us free will. That is where we run into trouble. Think of children. Just because you tell them not to do something doesn’t mean that every child will listen. Some will do that thing just because you said not to. But do you hate your child just because they misbehaved? Some will play with matches, even though you told them not to, and get burned. I am not going to say that is black and white with every child or circumstance but a generality. Because of free will everyone has the capacity of doing good or evil. It’s how people live there lives that makes a difference in the world.

      • patriot156

        your in my realm now buddy and I have read Genises I’ve read whole book the bible now on my third time through and it says there were Giants in the land then, but read my post above about how mankind was here many thousands of years more than 6k. When I read scripture then try to place 6k years in all of that I can’t. The first 7 generations of adam equal more than 7k years alone. ALso no one knows how long adam lived in the garden of eden before the fall. he coudl of lived many thousands of years there before the fall. He was imortal after all. He only began to age after sin came in not before. Also the book of enoch talks about enoch flying over the garden of eden that the angel michael I beleive is showing him, and it says this is where your grandfather who was cast out in his old age. That to me means he lived in eden many many thousands of years before satan was able to reach eve.
        Also think about the timelines after the flood Noah still live several hundred years after. That woudl place him down almost to Moses time and modern Israel if only 6k years because they’ve placed the flood at only 2500BC which is almost mathematically impossible to have been that soon. if your going on the assumption of 4004bc creation. The book of jubilees tells us that Adam lived outside the Garden for a time The bible also says this when it says he was placed in the garden. But the book of jubilees says he had to wait a certain amount of days because of some law about having a son or doaughter, then eve had to wait 80 days for her to be pure again from having a daughter or something. Read it though. No ones calling God a liar, but I’m calling man a liar when they use scripture to rule others and say nothing else is correct other than what they say. Remember Jesus said beware of the PHarasees. Pharasses were the rulers and rich people who kissed ass on the romans and were able to build up a tidy little sum and had lots of money under their rule. SO when jesus came on the scene they killed him because he threatened thier power over the people.
        Mian reason someone would say stay away from this that or another is becuase the know the truth and lose ctrl that way. Same comes from the saying that prophecy or scripture would not be any private interpretaion in dealing with someone who reads the scripures and comes up with some other kind of thinking than the staus quoe they see that as a threat.
        Remember it says in Daniel to shutt up the Books Plural until the time of the end or time of Gentiles so any kind of understanding of prophecy coudl not come before then, and that time came to and end in 1948 and 1967 wheN Israel retook the holy land and Jeurselum.

    • D Shot

      That’s a lie. There are several ancient scriptures that point to man being on earth that long.

  • EmilyEnso

    Its all in Michael Cremo.
    The hidden History of Mankind.

  • Bobby Lokey

    The ads on this site are so aggressive and agitating that I had to stop reading the article 1/4 way in. Congratulations on running me off.

  • LibertyTreeBud

    So, nobody came up with a shoe size for this footprint?

  • Steve smith

    On a related story, they also found a fossilized pair of Nike Jordan’s nearby.

  • Steve F1

    This proves one thing that they have not clue on how to date anything. They base their dates on dinosaur bones found in the rock yet people are finding that those bones can still have viable dna proving their not over 50,000 years old.

  • Willease

    I’m reasonably sure mammals didn’t exist yet during the Permian period, much less humans.

  • Wyatt

    290 million years ago, we crawled out of the ocean like tadpoles. Slowly, over eons, we evolved into modern man to reach for the stars. We split into thousands of different races across the globe to evolve in our own ways at our own pace. What a fantastic fairy tale. The same science that taught that theory for centuries, will tell you that it takes many many hundreds of millions of years for a species to evolve only slightly. Yet, for the most part, they thought we have been around for only about a million years and that was around “LUCY’S” time, who was more ape than human. Confused yet? What fantasy do you want to believe in? Everyone on Planet Earth evolved from Africa Man? AHAHAhahahahaha. With Africa’s history as we know it today and as far back as recorded history goes, there shouldn’t be any human life on Earth if that line of thought were true. Maybe they should rethink the whole thing. Maybe they should embrace the idea that Planet Earth is just a ZOO exhibit or perhaps an experiment? Maybe a breeding spot to keep the different species/specimens available for transplanting? Or perhaps it is all set up to provide them with entertainment. .

  • Pingback: L’Apocalisse del Pianeta Mallona Parte 11 | Più Consapevoli()

  • Chathura

    Buddhism has
    told the same story before 2500+ years from now. According to Buddhism this is a
    never ending cycle and there will be huge disasters from fire, water and air
    time to time and those will destroy all living creatures. then again new
    generations of animals will born with the support of environment, this is kind
    of a restart and there is no any creator of the world. Its only a result of environmental
    cycle. in one day after millions of years, this planet will destroy permanently
    and new one will create with remaining debris.

  • Sean

    What would this 290 million year old human have eaten?

    • manley


    • Tom C


      • Sean

        What would the crust be made of?

    • DanielAllison

      Any thing that did not eat them first. LOL

      • Sean

        I was thinking more of the fact that our primary plant food source (grass of one type or another) had not yet evolved. I’m not so sure about the appearance of tubers tho.

        • DanielAllison

          The fact that we have canine teeth indicates we were meat eaters and the molars would indicate we were plant eaters, isn’t that called omnivorous? Again I say they would eat anything that did not eat them first. I would guess that for much of their protein they were scavengers, eating what larger animals left behind. I know that is not very popular line of thought, but the early humans were quite weak and small compared to what was roaming around at the time. If I was living at that time I would find a tyranasaurus Rex(sp?) and follow carefully behind it and eat what it left.

  • Pingback: Найден отпечаток стопы человека возрастом 290 млн лет | Свежие новости 24()

  • Vsauce

    There is no need to argue. If you believe that it is that old then well..believe it, but if you don’t and you think it is much newer…well……believe that then. It is all a matter of opinion since carbon dating is not very effective when dating rocks.

    • DanielAllison

      You are close to right. Carbon dating only works on organic compounds and not at all on rocks. It may work some what on a plant or animal, but not on a rock.

  • farid.m Roushdy

    The age of the stones is wrong, this kind of fossilization or petrification is the same like what happened to the dinosaurs, trees and dinosaur foot prints. Its not a chemical process but physics. Its not mineralization, its an instant change in the atomic structure of the water that turned it to silica as a result to the energy created by the impact that caused the mass extinction. This event could be wrongly dated. Read more: http://dinosaursonthetwinplanet.tumblr.com/

  • Alexandru AMOQ


  • Bob P

    Calling Bull on this one. .. that footprint didn’t come from that rock..

  • patriot156

    The dead sea scrolls have a book of Giants very fragmented but still there. THe book of enoch tells us of this time as well. Many say that the overlapping of ages of the first generations with their 900 year old life spans still holds to the 6k year theory, but reading the scriptures theres not enough time for only 6k years of eaths history to have all happened in their timeline.
    Adam lived 900 some odd years and so forth. Now yes he gave birth to seth at 150 years of age or so and seth gave birth to his son at whatever age it says, and so on and people add up that timeline and come to a 1100 years, or 1500 years or so, which is on some other site I’ve seen recently, but when you start to read the other books like ENoch Jubilees etc, and learn that there was some 450 years after Joseph to Moses, and then all the other stoires in just Genisis alone one has to conclude there was way more time going on in pre flood era than just a mere 1100-1500 years then what ever time after that to get to David and more modern times and such.
    A thousand years is but day etc… this has to mean God doesn’t count time as we do either at all or very little time which would mean why we had immortality in the first place was because we didn’t keep time back then.
    Point is Genises six tells us about the giants that lived here many thousands of years ago, and if created and not evolved then it makes sense that we would find artifacts of pre flood times. It also makes sense that man was here many many thousands of years in preflood times, and more likely had technology.

    • Dew Free

      try taking a look at google earth Mt Ararat turn N to W position and zoom down and look at the old foot print 1880 feet long 7 to 9 hundred feet wide right beside a ship 2.5+
      miles long 1100 feet wide 534 ft high and know that it supports the dead sea scroll account and know that our bible was written 600 years after them scrolls around 300ad and that Rome is a hider of information.It is still that way today.much information is still hidden from our eyes.

  • James K

    Just by reading some of the comments I think I have lost 20 points off my IQ. The stupidity and utter ignorance of humanity is astonishing !

  • Mr E Man

    Tribal man: Tell me priest, if I had never heard of God, from your or any one else, would I have been welcomed into his heaven without ever having to submit to him?
    Priest: Why, Yes!
    Tribal man: Then why did you have to tell me about him?

  • Moses Johnson

    the question is this why aren’t their any whites bones found in africa or the middle east where did whites come from they cdidn’t come out of africa or the bible. in fact the bible don’t have whites in it at all their was not whites on the planet before 335 meaning whites didn’t come from us at all

  • Eric Trzaska

    especially steve smith…. you guys spewing your disgusting god talk and bible nonsense. Pathetic little fucks you all are.

  • Tony Manuge

    Actually, it could be the other way around, the fossil is not that old. Either way both can be explained Biblically The Bible speaks of the dinosaurs and Nephilim explains the giant foot print.

  • Dennis Eijs

    Time travel?

  • Someone please tell me why people are unable to stay on topic. In this case, the topic happens to be the presence of a human footprint in rock that is dated to 290 million years. Why is it that everyone just has to preach their religion? Grow up people!!! Remember that EVERYONE has the freedom of choice; EVERYONE already knows the gospel stories; and that EVERYONE does not care to read your religious debate and/or jargon. Thank you for staying on topic in the future. End rant.

    • DanielAllison

      Since you are off topic that reminds me of an old adage about a pot and a kettle.

  • ProfStar

    Kathy Wills discovered a human footprint in petrified mud atop a 15,000′ mountaintop in northern Bolivia 2 years ago. Though documented with video and photos this discovery has been ignored. “Modern science” isn’t interested in such discoveries. It violates the accepted norm.

    For more about this, visit:

    • Mike Nunyabiz

      @”Kathy Wills discovered a human footprint in petrified mud”

      WTF is “petrified mud”? Do you understand what “petrification” is?

      @”Though documented with video and photos this discovery has been ignored”

      Maybe that’s because you really have to work hard at imagining that crack in the rock as looking like a footprint.


      Nice truck.

      “Woo” must bring in some really heavy bucks.

  • David

    One day to GOD, is as a thousand years to us, the Bible story could have been “written” long after the Adam and Eve story, when people learned to write. If you take when GOD created the Universe in one day ? many thousands of OUR years. never discredit the Bible or other books, as to what happened in CREATION is far beyond our comprehension, Faith alone, makes us believe, be as a little child and believe, not understand.

  • Jim

    Reading the comments, I’d really like to see more in reference to the story and where the footprints came from. The debates below focus more on books humans wrote than what is written on the earth. Because for me, a fossil is part of a page of the book we call earth. They are the “written words ” used when there were no words to tell the story. And to me they speak louder than books which lack foundations in the past of this planet.

  • adrien

    There’s only one footprint

    • Tom C

      They only used one foot to walk back then! That way, when the first foot wore out, they had a spare!

  • Gabriel Van Middelkoop

    the weird thing i find about the last picture is are that it standing 90 degrees from the ground why on earth would we ever walk like that on our bare feet up on a mountain or wall or what ever and it also perfectly imprinted so was there someone standing for millions of years with his foot agiants it and sink in?
    in time or something i find the last one hard to believe and makes no sense at all

    • knightnoctum

      Most of the mountains of the world are comprised of material which were once distributed flat and later pushed up at odd angles by earth quakes and tectonic plates pushing together over great periods of time.

      • Gabriel Van Middelkoop

        That could explain the weird angle.
        But i can never understand how a foot print wil stay like that i mean if i would stand in sand or ground it would wash away by rain or would slightly imprint and would be gone in weeks how does such imprent ocur i mean did the guy stand there for years or something how does this happen i really wonder i never really think about but when i did it made no sense to me how that imprent would stay and be that deep

  • Chris

    Puma punku was dated at 10000 bc. With stone, and cuts we can’t move or make with our own modern machinery today. That is all

  • William Revis

    Could it be the bible story’s have it right all a long? Even some of the older civilizations had story’s going way back.

  • Pingback: The 290 Million Year Old Fossil Human Footprint – REALLY!?!? | EARTH 4 ALL()

  • Randy F

    By attempting to project your personal views onto a 290 million footprint that has nothing to do with a book written less than 2000 years ago is futile at best. One knew nothing of the other. Espousing this passage and that quote as applying to this situation doesn’t fit at all. Simply put it’s like trying to jam a square peg into a round hole. All hot air. Unless you were there, of which obviously none of you were, it’s a moot point. If that’s your only reference point you haven’t convinced anyone of any real evidence to support any real claims. The only way they could date this footprint is with radiocarbon dating, of which has some controversy as to it’s validity to date objects and findings of various things older than our known existence upon this planet. That footprint may be say 100,000 years old, you nor I can say for sure. So get off your high horse and quit being such an ass.

    • DanielAllison

      Radio carbon dating does not work on rocks. Some question if it works at all.

      • Mike Nunyabiz

        @”Some question if it works at all.”

        Yes. Those people are called “uneducated”.

        Idiot fundies…

  • Marv Walling

    Science doesn’t worry about changing history, if there is repeatable evidence of something being true science will change its opinion to align with what can be proven.

  • Michael McCarthy

    would really like to see some references included in these articles rather than speculation.

    Michael McCarthy while I want to believe this, this steems suspect to me and because of my own research about barefoot cultures. Here is a photo of a San bushman from the khalahari. See how the foot looks NOTHING like “modern day feet”. So, in looking at the footprint in this article, the footprint looks like that of someone who wore shoes that constrained the foot and changed the bone structure, rather than a foot free from impediments, which I assume was the case 290 million years ago.

    Not intending to be a downer, just use my noggin and be humble enough to be told I might be mistaken

    • SuperLuminal Man

      I was thinking along similar lines …

    • Wazza

      Wow, you’re not suggesting today’s scientists could be wrong in any way, are you?

      • stairyice

        this footprint shouldn’t look like the bushman imprint if this civilization is far advance like ours or more advance at that time and now.

  • Why does every conversation have to end with folks arguing about the Bible? Folks need to get a grip…and keep their religious conversations to areas that specifically refer to them. smdh!!!

  • Thomas Degenstein-Garcia

    There is a written work recently translated from old hieroglyphs: “The 1st of 15 Sacred Records of the Nemenhah.” In it there is a piece titled, “the Narrative of the Creation.” This work is written in a dialogue fashion with character parts, just like a play at the theater. Anyhow, in it is described and attested, upon the Spirit of Christ, that at the time of Adam and Eve’s experience inside the Garden of Eden. there were human like creatures living upon the earth outside the Garden of Eden.

  • David Patterson

    This really resonates with me. Of course mainstream people deny it it would change everything we know about science and history.

  • Tom C

    Nearby to this human footprint, is the fossilized footprint of a rabbit! It most assuredly is that of the Easter Bunny!

  • Arie van den Akker

    It’s not millions of years old, but it does prove’s there were different times when there were giants like the Bible tells us. Bevore the flood the world was different and people lived like 800 to 900 years. Check out https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxiEtqPja47nnqsJNrdOIQQ

    • Timothy Wolfe

      all you people are ridiculous, FUCK the bible! it is not a history book retards, i’m so tired of people using it to explain anything. Sound as ridiculous as ancient alients guys using greek mythology to explain something from ancient times. Get a grip.

      • Jason

        There is a reason they call him “The God of the Gaps”

  • Michael Caputo

    I love how a story like this causes people to argue about the bible and religion. Personally, I’m a Christian and believe Jesus rose from the dead. If I can believe God as a man can raise from the dead, I should certainly be open to the possibility that this 290 million year old footprint is real. Which I am. We aren’t as smart as we think we are. This footprint could also be of a time traveling scientist doing research a 290 million year old earth.

  • Randy patterson

    Just because a rock impression looks exactly like a footprint is by no means any form of proof that it actually is one. Why pose the question of whether we need to rewrite history? That’s pretty much what paleontology and archaeology are all about, since the dawn of science. Scholars don’t “have a problem” with new discoveries. It’s a part of their job description to study puzzling artifacts. If this turns out to be the real thing, it may rock the science world and all the rest of us, but it wont cause any sociological changes that alter our current ways of living. Maybe it’ll shut up the Young-Earthers, but that would actually be a surprise if ANYTHING ever shuts them up. So, you claim that this footprint-shaped formation “clearly is one”? Who said that? Can you provide a link to any scientific organisation that makes this claim? Where is it being studied? I’m not going to ask more questions from here because there are a whole slew of other considerations. But to suggest that our world is about to change, and to suggest that no scientist is trying very hard to study it is sloppy and misleading journalism.

    • Dal

      Ok brainiac, you look at the pictures and enlighten us as to what you think it is!

      • Randy patterson

        Okay, I don’t need anyone to tell me to look at the pictures, since I already did. I see what you see — pixels forming an image that resembles a human footprint cast in a rock. People see Jesus on a piece of toast, or a puppy in the clouds, too. It doesn’t mean the son of god is getting butter smeared on his face, it only means that humans are good at pattern recognition. You’re aware that there is no ladle in the night sky when you look at the asterism known in America as the Big Dipper (in Europe, it’s known as the Plough). We see that “object” from a pattern of random stars in the sky. If someone draws a stick figure wearing boots, a cowboy hat, a guitar and a beard & sunglasses, millions of people know who it is supposed to represent. Again an example of pattern recognition. I shouldn’t be called on to make a decision based on a YouTube image. And you don’t have any more of an idea what it is than I do, so don’t waste my time arguing about your own wishful thinking. You can believe whatever you want, you do that anyway. If you think it looks like a footprint, I can agree that you think it looks like a footprint. But I have better things to do than to rematriculate into paleontology and travel the world studying fossils. I’m almost retired and I’m spending my time in a band from here on out. I’m a pot-smoking high school dropout with long hair. Why not write a letter of inquiry to a college with a paleontology department? They would be the ones who can answer your question, Einstein.

        • donnieK

          I think humans sometimes want to believe so much that may misunderstand evidence.
          I’m not saying there’s nothing left to know about all this, but I’m almost completely convinced we are not looking at the right things the way we should.

          We could have enormous evidence of history manipulation right in front of us and
          in fact we may be using it or watching it but we are not regarding it as strange because we are used to it.

          This may sound strange but we have to open our eyes and stop trusting everything we are told.

  • kiwi11

    This is great! But can someone please provide a source? I want to look further.

  • Dean Tripstar Rose

    Check out the documentary “Forbidden Archaeology” it should be on youtube or another video site if you google it. This isn’t the only such case that blows the modern interpretation of prehistoric anthropology out of the water.

  • Mario Buildreps

    That doesn’t surprise me at all. I’m busy with an extensive research on the alignment of pyramids around the world and relate them to crustal shifts. The result are amazing.

    I’m not from a mainstream scientific institute that wouldn’t allow me to study such a thing. I’m quite well equipped with mathematical knowledge to research this on my own, with help of others sometimes, especially as my sounding board.

    From the alignments we drew the conclusion that the current North pole is where it is with a certainty of 100%. That wouldn’t surprise no one I guess.

    What is surprising is that most of the Latin American pyramids, Chinese pyramids, and some other structures as well are pointing to former pole positions, with certainties of 100%, 98.5% and 87.5%. So, three former pole positions with great certainty.

    The former North pole was on Greenland. To be more precise at the location: 73.5°N, 043.8°W. Give or take ±0.5°. This is for 99.99999997% certain. We can safely say for 100%.

    Position is one thing. Finding out when this happened is another thing, and that is an interpretation.

    For example Teotihuacan is pointing to the former pole on Greenland. So, how old could it actually be? With great certainty it is built between 110,000 and 200,000 years ago.

    If humanity is much older than mainstream is telling us, than there is actually no limit in going back, not even many millions of years.
    Mainstream science is now dismissed as a ridiculous, almost medieval practice.

    • Mike Nunyabiz

      @”I’m not from a mainstream scientific institute…”



  • Jason

    What are the chances of one single footprint being left 290 million years ago? Surely there would be more than just one if it were really a human footprint. But since there is only one, you have to consider that it’s not what you think it is.

    Also, look at how perfect it is. If a human was standing in mud that later turned to stone, there is little chance the footprint would not be distorted over 290 million years.

    Bottom line is, if it is a human footprint, there should be another one right next to it, and others leading up to, and away from it.

    • Nathan Togain

      Maybe he only had one foot and had to hop?

      • Jason

        That’s funny! I hope you are being funny

        • Gabriel Van Middelkoop

          So 250 million years ago its suddenly impossible to lose a limb with the logic you are dating and if this whole thing is true and legit and it would be a modern man’s feet how primtive he would be he could still atleast made some crutches to still walk around while he would broke or had lost an leg

          • Jason

            This is silly, but ok. So this one legged man was out there hopping around but was in no danger of being of becoming lunch for some large predator? Let me ask you, if you were part of a group, and you were tasked with hunting the days meals, would you take a one legged dude out on the hunt with you?

            Something tells me the life expectancy of any hominid living back then –even though there weren’t any back then– would have been pretty short for a healthy specimen. Surely much shorter for one who lost a limb, assuming he could have survived the loss of the limb.

            You are trying WAAAAAAAY to hard to believe this nonsense.

          • Gabriel Van Middelkoop

            Im not trying to believe but he would have no chance of being usefull in a hunt that doesnt mean he could be suported by his tribe that took care of him or something and yes he wouldnt probably get very old the point i try to make
            In that time or every timeline the modern human with brains could possibly still just walk on crutches after losing a leg or broke it does not say they would survive long but its possible

    • DanielAllison

      You can find what you wish for at Glen Rose, Texas. There is a trail of footprints for you to peruse at your heart’s content. Of course you will not believe what your eyes behold even though it is in stone. LOL

      • Jason

        You didn’t answer the question. I understand why, but I have to point out that nobody has answered the question I posed.

        • DanielAllison

          You failed to understand that at Glen Rose, Texas there is a line of prints that seems to be of one man that covers several yards and it appears he was following a dinosaur, even to the point of stepping in the dinosaur tracks. That is what you asked for, but it seems that my estimation of you may have been a little too optimistic. There is none so blind as he who will not see, That my friend is the bottom line. As to why there is only one foot print at that site, you have answered your own question in your second paragraph. Have a good night.

          • Jason

            No, I did not fail to understand what you were saying. I just know it’s a false YEC theory. Those so called human footprints are just metatarsal dinosaur tracks, made by bipedal dinosaurs that sometimes impressed their metatarsi (heels and soles) as they walked. When the digit impressions of such tracks are subdued by mud-backflow or secondary infilling, the resulting depressions often superficially resemble large human footprints.

          • revwillie

            And you are telling us humans hatched from dinosaur eggs?

          • Timothy Wolfe

            except those didn’t live 250 million years ago either

          • Fred

            The prints that you refer to are DINOSAUR prints not human

        • revwillie

          The chances of one single foot print at over 240 million years ago is only compounded by the other two foot prints found below it. While Jeff MacDonald found the one foot print, Standford and USC teams found two more foot prints since 1987 in New Mexico. At Glen Rose Texas Dinosaur Park, teams have found similar tracks in stone that is believed to be over 248 million years old.

  • John Walker

    there are more imprints in this wall looks like polygon

  • Irvin Quek

    I can read many ignorant comments here. Especially those using abrahamic religions to explain this discovery.

    Go and read about what Buddhism said about ‘abhasvara’.

    You will have all the answers including questions why there is only one print at a time, why there wasn’t more prints…

    Don’t use your brain-washed minds of an original creator in an inbox manner. Then you will never understand.

  • dreed0519

    Must be a time traveler from the future.

  • Aajaxx

    Clickbait for the gullible. There are a lot of tracks of Permian species at this site, but nothing like the photograph or anything resembling primate footprints.

  • Pingback: 290 million year old human footprint has researchers scratching their heads | BIMBA()

  • DanielAllison

    They should go to Glen rose, Texas where there are a number of them in the Dinosaur State Park. Some of them are with dinosaur tracks and even one that is in a dinosaur track. It only proves that man and dinosaurs existed at the same time as it is a known fact that carbon dating is very inaccurate.

    • Mike Nunyabiz

      @”It only proves that man and dinosaurs existed at the same time”

      No they didn’t. Your ignorance of the subject is appalling.

      @”it is a known fact that carbon dating is very inaccurate”

      You’re either a liar or breathtakingly stupid.

      Idiot fundies…

      • teach yourself before others

        carbon dating cannot date things that old

  • Sumeet Jain

    As per Jain scriptures the height of our first Thirtankara was 3000 feet. And he lived for 59,27,040, 0000 0000 0000 00.

  • Pingback: 290 million year old human footprint has researchers scratching their heads – from a White Stone,()

  • Jon

    lol here it is again. Jesus Ivan it’s only been about 3 days

  • AharonRa2342

    42s and 23s lol. You are all stupid. ..my thumbs are soar so im not going into it atm ….Aharon-Ra X Allshouse add me on fb if you know that humans and dinosaurs did share the earth. Its not hard to believe we forgot. Tiny specs we are cant even remember breakfast or were you put the keys you use every day. Or 40-50 years 7.5 billion will pass without much more than a squeek of an impact and a few strings sent off into the world. 7.5billion people farting 3-10 × a day ….that is alot of nitrogen and methane chilling about. We are a virus….assets if you will. Few will remember. ..even fewer will escape this earth or pass that dome we call atmosphere lol. Good luck to yall….

  • Dumpthekoolaid

    So far, my favorite comments are from the folks that say “it might look like a human foot print, but it’s not”. Next are the “if it was a real human foot print, there would be another one next to it” crowd. The answer to this is obvious; Humans originally evolved with only one leg and one foot. Known as “hopinids”. It took several million more years, of random unguided mutations for that 2nd leg to finally evolve. I thought everybody knew this. Reminds me of a foot print in a cow pie I saw in a field as a young lad. My family never figured out who the one legged man was that made it.

    • Burt Clarke

      Love it!

    • Sheeka Shah

      if the foot prints r so huge then the distance between each of them also would be huge…. and may be over the years they might have got erased …and there r few facts and pics showing adjacent prints too … u cld refer to comment below of sumeet jain might find a clue in…

      • Kevin Dean Heairet

        He’s joking 🙂

    • Kevin Dean Heairet

      Nice! Great humor 🙂

  • Pingback: Una huella humana de hace 290 millones de años, trae de cabeza a los científicos – Uno igual Infinito()

  • Pingback: 290 million year old human footprint has researchers scratching their heads – Earth Mystery News()

  • Timothy Wolfe

    I’m more in the camp that it IS a human foot print, but that we truly have never figured out how to accurately date…..really……almost anything. Archaeologists should be asking, “what are we missing?” and start over trying to re-science the concept of carbon dating, etc…… have we been here longer than we think? Probably! Did all dinasaurs actually die out 60 million to 40 million years ago? Unlikely…… Empty out the back rooms of all the museums everywhere, pull a truck up to the underground archives at the smithsonian and lets just truly……start over trying to figure this all out without all these preconceived notions we have. Put together the puzzle starting with today’s technology instead of trying to build off outdated techniques that we used 70 years ago and now try to fit everything into that timeline which is clearly inaccurate.

    • Sheikh M Ahmad

      i agree 100% with you. i think we need to change the techniques how look back in time. this carbon dating needs to be upgraded some how to better predict the dates..

  • Goatess

    I remember reading years ago that a fossil humanoid footprint was found, with the fossil of an ancient mollusk imbedded in it. I also read somewhere else that a fossil footprint of a humanoid foot in what appeared to be an ancient rope-type sandal on it. Wish I could remember the sources, so that I could point those of you who are curious in the right direction. But fossils like this HAVE been found before, just not reported widely. And that was before the internet, when information like this was harder to access.

    • Pauline Nixon Araujo

      I actually remember reading that piece myself.. and wondered about it for a long time..so who knows exactly WHEN humans first walked this earth.. or as someone else mentioned ‘aliens’.. Only our primitive minds and human arrogance denies other possibilities unless we can explain them away with our limited logic. An open mind is vital if we are to evolve.

  • Pingback: 290 Million Year-Old Human Footprint Has Researchers Scratching Their Heads – BozzFeed()

  • Kiba Kirishimi

    I have 2 theories. 2 theories that support both parties. 1. Could be god planting the seeds of life. 2. Aliens

    • Whatever

      Nephlim .

  • Lintury Emenyi

    Soon you will realize that all what you thought you knew was all wrong.

  • Christopher Cheong

    How do u date a footprint?

    • Allan Tan

      Good point. I was thinking of that.
      1. Age of footprint must be less than the age of the stone it is on.
      2. Why is there only one footprint? If the human had walked, there should be at least numerous footprints around the area and/on on the stone, unless there was only one human alive, and he/she had only one foot.

      • Whatever

        See Buster WTT reply , that is the answer .

  • Sheeka Porwal

    Yes one can find answers to this in jainism. Please read metaphysics of jainism it’s the most ancient religion ever existed. And if this picture shows only one foot print other would be at a very distance pace since its logical to say because the size of footprint is big hence the structure of ancient humans were also large and while they would walk the distance between each pace was too much long. Ancient civilization was much more
    advanced in all streams than us.

    • Naja

      Advanced in what though exactly? Space travel? Engineering? Biomedical? All of which we have and have no evidence of anything like it prior to us today.
      Even a smartphone would have been dug up by now had they existed before us as humans today, things like plastic would still be around for us to find along with their language printed on it.
      Ancient people DO have more mystery than us and that is about all and its because of their fragmented ruins. Past that its just UFO’s, science fiction and speculation while certainly possible but mostly just fun.

      • Sheeka Shah

        may be u might not find plastics or smartphones technology for the possibility that they might not have ever used it or they should have been using something else …may be their life style wotluld have been much more different than us. when we talk about evidence we need to self experience rather than accepting what nasal,scientists,politics, highly professional talk about … may be they disclose partial truths or may be edited info. we have just engraved all about bhamhand( celestial universe) what we are been taught by society instead of questioning and reasoning and finding true answers.

        • Naja

          Okay though aside from talking about a state of mind on thoughts about bhamhand and the lot and therafter…
          It still stands to logic that, again, there is zero evidence based on the material world which materials ancient civilizations would be limited to such as ourselves to claim that ancient civilizations are “better in all streams” unless by “streams” you mean something outside of scientific progression.

          All people on earth must use the same materials as we do today, ancient civilizations are as much bound to the table of elements as we are and would, by being better than us technologically (like you may claim) have left behind in some way materials that do not decompose granting evidence that they are clearly better.
          ..but when you say streams it sounds like you may be talking about thought, religions, meditation and state of mind.

          With all due respect because the ancients are amazing…Ancient civilizations while having achieved many wonders of the world have never produced anything scientifically, technologically, artifically and engineered anything better than the year 2016+ and thats not a state of mind, theory or nasal political talk, its a fact.
          So by saying ancients are better than us “in all streams” is doing modern achievement a diservice as well as showing an ungreatfulness for what we have today. So unless you or anyone can provide exactly that evidence to back up such a massive claim then yeah..discussion over.

  • Buster WTT

    The stone was sediment at one time, like mud, several footprints were obviously made and only one “survived” to a dry season. This footprint dried into a cast and over the millions of years hardened into stone? Maybe?

    • Whatever

      That`s exactly what happened ..

    • The_Architect1968

      the type of rock it either is, or is made to look like would not form from mud with out a lot of heat and pressure so this foot print would have been lost a long time ago before this type of rock formed, its obviously an igneous rock, so…

      • The_Architect1968

        additionally did they remove or did they never have the link to where the picture originally came from? cause I can not see any links or citation here at all

  • Jennifer Smith

    I want to know how tall a person would have to be to have feet that big.

  • Doug Chaney

    I just love the way “scientists” come up a THEORY on a way to date/age something and then it gets morphed by professors/teachers into infallible FACT! As IF something dated via said method MUST without any question actually BE said age! Interesting is the fact that while the reporter above is saying hundreds of millions of years, OTHERS are matter of factly plugging in a figure more like a hundred times YOUNGER than that! … lone I just read re SAME footprint is declaring it to be 3.6 million (as opposed to the above declaration close to 300 MILLION years??) Personally I think anyone that decideds to trust and then PRESUME that ANY of the “experts” are infallible? they are themselves being wholey dishonest or else at least are just so naive and gullible! I mean when does a person FINALLY LEARN that people are NOT TRUSTWORTHY no matter how convicted they claim to be! Bunch of egotistical BS liars we are by nature!!!

    • Brian Taylor

      Please fix your post. This is a grammatical and lexical nightmare that makes absolutely no sense. It’s a shame, because your post might actually be right on the money and make a lot of sense if you used an actual language to compose it. I’m not trying to be mean, just trying to understand the things that I read, and your post does not make that goal possible.

  • Pingback: 2.9亿年前人类脚印 可能让历史教科书重写(组图/视频) | 新视角()

  • Whatever

    They probably blame the Russians ….

  • Whatever

    It says in the Bible that when Adam went exploring , he came back and told God that there was already People Living Here .. Go Figure .

    • David from Macquarie hills

      Bible , a compilation of stories told over centuries and written up as if they were dictated by a deity whose presence is far from proveable.

      • Doodle

        You have no idea how wrong you are.

        • David from Macquarie hills

          Bunch of Chinese whispers ,written down by who knows who, with some cleric dictating the stories lol it is full of holes and deliberately written to make any one questioning it made to believe that they will miss out on a afterlife , scare tactics with no proof of existence except by quoting from this load of tripe , Take Noah eg so mmuch BS how long wud it take to get those animals all the way over there for one , space has been proven to be impossible , food wud be impossible and most of the insects would die before the floods stopped , utter rubbish

  • Devil’s Advocate

    Good grief. Talk about fake news!

    • Fake news? Get a grip and piss off.

      • Lennie Kotowski

        First earth age before Satan tried to over throw GOD.. Weallplayed in theunivwrse

  • Pingback: 6,000-Year-Old Amulet Found In Pakistan | Shift Frequency()

  • Carl Vanderwiel

    The stone itself might be about 290 million years old but the footprint must be younger, obviously the stone needs to be there before the footprint can be made.

    • Brian Taylor

      They didn’t say the stone was that old, they said the footprint was. There are methods to figure out how long ago a stone was worked, which (in the scenario that you’re describing) would mean chiseled into having this footprint depression.

      So they would know if the stone was altered to include a footprint, which is moot anyway because-

      That’s not really how fossils work. Fossils don’t get embedded in stone, they are left in mud or some soft sediment, which is then compressed by pressure or other natural methods into stone over millions of years. So in that instance, if the stone is 290 million years old, the footprint must also be that old. That is literally how all fossils are dated.

      • Carl Vanderwiel

        Fake news did u get it?

        • Brian Taylor

          Fortunately for me, and unfortunately for you, neither my comment, nor yours, are affected by that fact.

          You might as well have said “the earth is round because the sun is hot.”

          The earth certainly is round, so you’d be right, but the reasoning behind your conclusion has absolutely no basis in scientific theory, and in a discussion about any scientific topic, such reasoning is entirely pointless, sorry.

  • Carl Vanderwiel

    There are some M.F..ers out there that are simply trying to make a mess of things. Trying to confuse people.

  • Jim

    Here is a fact that no truthful person can refute. Scientists are guessing at everything. If you were not there to see it then you can say you know. Most òf science about the past is unprovable either way. I personally believe humans with intelligence just like us have been here for hundreds of millions of years not 200,000 years.

  • Pingback: 290 million year old human footprint | NEW AGE NEWS()