2,000-year-old ‘Books’ prove Jesus did not create a new religion, but restored an ancient tradition from the time of King David


Researchers from the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom, Roger Webb, and Chris Jeynes have just confirmed the authenticity of documents dating back more than 2,000 years, where Jesus and his disciples are mentioned. The ancient codices claim that Jesus did not create a new religion but RESTORED ancient tradition from the time of King David.

According to experts, the books –aka codices— suggest Christ was part of a Hebrew sect dating back 1,000 years to King David, who worshiped in the Temple of Solomon and believed in a male-female God.

What came to many as a surprise is that these ancient texts, which are believed to date back over 2,000 years could revolutionize our views on Christianity.

Tests performed by scholars proved the authenticity of the ancient texts joined by rings made of metal which are now considered as a revolutionizing discovery that could change the history of Christianity.

According to reports, evidence suggests that the codices date back to the 1st or 2nd century AD.

The real deal

Prof. Roger Webb, and Senior Liaison Fellow, Prof. Chris Jeynes, have reported that the codex did not demonstrate the radioactivity arising from atmospheric polonium that is typical of modern lead samples, indicating that the lead of the codex was smelted over a century ago, and is not a product of modern-day manufacturing.

Tests also confirmed that the language of the codices is Paleo-Hebrew. The codices are covered in eight-pointed stars, symbolic of the coming of the Messiah.

Revolutionizing Christianity

The portrait of Jesus. The metal ‘pages’ are held together like a ring binder and were found in Jordan in 2008.
The portrait of Jesus. The metal ‘pages’ are held together like a ring binder and were found in Jordan in 2008.

In the codices, which were carefully translated by specialists, it is explained that Jesus Christ was not trying to create a new religion, but RESTORED old traditions of the time of King David. It also clarifies that the god worshiped by Christ and his followers was both male and female.

The book was found in a cave in the West Bank in 2006, but its finding was not public until 2011. Researchers described the discovery as one of the oldest proofs of the historical existence of Jesus. However, contrary to what we have been told, this discovery offers an entirely revolutionary insight into the life of Jesus.

Currently, the ancient texts are located in the Antiquities Department of Amman, the capital of Jordan. Given their importance, archaeologists responsible for their analysis are demanding that local authorities redouble their protection measures to ensure their safety.

Image Credit: David Elkington

Like it? Share with your friends!


  1. No, Jesus (or Yesuha as he was actually known) sought only to o restore Judaism in equal partnership with his cousin, John the Baptiser, which had been corrupted by Greco-Roman and even Egyptian influences. Paul (aka Saul) ended up creating a new religion. BTW, the author(s) of this article ironically is feeding into the Pauline myth by referring to Jesus as “Christ” or “Jesus Christ” as if “Christ” was his last name.

      1. I call him 2000 years dead.

        Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device——– Original message ——–From: Disqus Date: 12/11/2016 6:13 PM (GMT-05:00) To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Comment on 2,000-year-old ‘ Books’ prove Jesus did not create a new religion, but RESTORED an ancient tradition from the time of King David
        “He doesn’t care what you call him, as long as you call him.”


        A new comment was posted on Ancient Code

        Exposing Milabs

        He doesn’t care what you call him, as long as you call him.

        6:13 p.m., Sunday Dec. 11


        Other comments by Exposing Milabs


        to Exposing Milabs

        Exposing Milabs’s comment is in reply to

        Paul Hosse:

        No, Jesus (or Yesuha as he was actually known) sought only to o restore Judaism in equal partnership with his cousin, John the Baptiser, which … Read more

        You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to paul_hosse.

        You can unsubscribe
        from emails about replies to paul_hosse
        by replying to this email with “unsubscribe”
        or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by
        adjusting your notification settings.

        1. Please allow 24 hours and sometimes more for a response. If this is urgent, please red flag your email and put urgent in the heading. Thanks, RUBY

        2. In the Bible is the correct description of true Christians,
          …and false “Christians”. It is not hard to understand what is
          hypocrisy in this matter. The Bible speaks frequently of the many
          ignorant, deceived, …hypocritical, …false, …self-interested in the
          congregations and in sects and the blood that is on their hands and the
          greed in their hearts and their unsuitability to be God’s friend. We can
          not be so obtuse. Qualifying as a true Christian is not a simple thing.
          It can not be ‘faked’ before our God, as one would rightly expect. We
          correctly described and instantly react to false religion in relation to
          the Bible. Can we then identify true religion in relation to the Bible?
          Of course. jw dot org

    1. I would definitely shun that. Gnosticism was one doctrinal movement that didn’t make much sense.

      1. The true Gnostics were pre-religion. They were the great educators of the times, like Hypatia at the Library of Alexandria….they did not believe in salvationism through another …rather that one could only save themselves…this was the stark parallel between Gnosticism & Christianity.

        1. And yet they considered women as perpetually unclean, and unworthy of their education. Big sexists they were, I can’t comprehend the way they justified this.

          1. No we are not on the same page here. The Gnostics were about equality between genders, and women were highly educated, such as Hypatia. They were the same intellects down the lineage that sought to bring Wisdom back to life during the Romantic Period.

    2. Sounds like this “author” hasn’t read the Bible in any small way, but pushes on with his point, …his agenda…, …his purpose, regardless of what plainly can be seen by any child like what it is saying about who Jesus is, who God is, what Jehovah’s God’s purpose is, the places on the timeline of any event in the Bible, the credibility of writers, the candor of the men and women and kings speaking in the Bible about God and how what is to be understood reveals a need to connect with our Creator in a heart felt, natural, curious, respectful way and at times a literally and at times in spiritual ways and describes where the opinion of men as compared to God rightly takes their proper place if one wants the loving, wonderfully merciful and forgiving approval of Jehovah God. jw dot org

  2. The books must be genuine does it follow that the contents are real and reliable. Those days they also had disbelievers who scattered false news about Jesus

    1. I’ll say it’s pure anti-Christian propaganda. A child may understand the Bible. This at best is just tabloid babble for hits, at worst it is the Devils work. jw dot org

  3. These texts are also diluted retelling of Sumerian lore that predates it by a few thousand years. We’ve been living with 2000yrs of lies.

    1. And what prevents experts being experts, …as long as they are experts? You remember the story; A student in a college class writes on the chalk board before the Prof. comes in “question authority”. So the Prof. comes arrives and without breaking stride also writes “If authority answers will you listen?”.

Comments are closed.