Connect with us

Ancient Code

This Documentary explains the REAL reason why NASA never returned to the Moon

The unexplained

This Documentary explains the REAL reason why NASA never returned to the Moon



According to Brandenburg It was (the Clementine Mission) a photo reconnaissance mission basically to check out if someone was building bases on the moon that we didn’t know about. Were they expanding them?


Have you ever asked yourself why mankind has not returned to the moon in recent years? According to many researchers and Ufologists, the American space agency is hiding a sinister secret from society, and we are not familiar with everything that has occurred—and is still occurring—on the surface of the moon.

Many people claim there is enough evidence to suggest there are Alien bases on the moon. Rumors, declassified documents, and whistleblowers have come forward saying that agencies around the globe simply cannot afford to let society know what’s really on the moon.

The idea that there are alien bases on the moon would explain why we stopped so abruptly going to the moon. Also, with our current technology, why haven’t we created a permanent manned outpost on the lunar surface? Wouldn’t it be easier to build a permanent structure on the surface of the moon, than to have a floating space station orbiting around Earth?

According to Milton Cooper, a Naval Intelligence Officer tells us that not only does the Alien Moon Base exist but the U.S. Naval Intelligence Community refers to the Alien Moon Base as “Luna,” that there is a huge mining operation going on there, and that is where the aliens keep their huge mother ships while the trips to Earth are made in smaller “flying saucers”.

In addition to a large number of ‘anomalous’ objects on the surface of the moon, statements from former astronauts, highly ranking government officials, and scientists have caused a great conspiracy theory to unfold, surrounding the moon and its true origin.

However you put it, the moon is probably the most mysterious celestial body in our solar system, and has fascinated the human race for thousands of years.

But, is there really an alien base there? Well, I guess you can’t know that but, is it a coincidence that there are some lunar rocks that have been found to contain PROCESSED METALS such as Brass, Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237?

These elements have NEVER been found to occur naturally. Uranium 236 is a radioactive nuclear waste which is found in spent nuclear and reprocessed Uranium. More interestingly, Neptunium 237 is a radioactive metallic element and a by-product of nuclear reactors and the production of Plutonium.

Dr. Harold Urey, Nobel Prize winner for Chemistry said he was “terribly puzzled by the rocks astronauts found on the moon and their Titanium content. The samples were unimaginable and mind-blowing since researchers could not account for the presence of Titanium.

According to Dr. Brandenburg –who was involved in NASA’s Clementine Mission to the Moon, which was a joint space project where the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) participated together with NASA to do some research on the moon:

“It was (the Clementine Mission) a photo reconnaissance mission basically to check out if someone was building bases on the moon that we didn’t know about. Were they expanding them? Of all the pictures I’ve seen from the moon that show possible structures, the most impressive is an image of a mile wide recto-linear structure. This looked unmistakably artificial, and it shouldn’t be there. As somebody in the space defense community, I look on any such structure on the moon with great concern because it isn’t ours, there’s no way we could have built such a thing. It means someone else is up there.”



 

 

14 Comments
  • marlio

    We never went to the moon as we can’t go through the radiated, Van Alan Belt, which is 33,000 miles wide. The Van Alan Belt is Thr Firmament, which God put above the Earth in Genesis, when he created our planet.God put it there to protect the Earth, and we will never be able to go through it!!!

    • Fantasma de la Ópera

      Man, where do you come from? The Bible Belt or from the nut house?

      • Savatage64 (Always Deplorable)

        Hang tight….any article about space travel, moon rocks, NASA, satellites, Mars….he says the same thing: Van Allen belt….you’ve heard of the phrase ‘broken record’ right? Well, he’s just broken.

      • Goatess

        As far as anything scientific is concerned, I’m not sure there is a difference between the Bible Belt and the nut house. . . .

    • UntrollableRiderOfAPurplePony

      Lol. I have just tracked some of your history and i now of the opinion that you have been trolling the whole time.

      Well done. You had me going there for a while that you actually did believe in that Firmament twoddle.

      • rickd12

        I’m still not sure. He is either a master of sarcasm or genuinely mental

        • Savatage64 (Always Deplorable)

          You used the word “master” to describe marlio….I’m going with “genuinely mental”

          • UntrollableRiderOfAPurplePony

            Lmao. You 2 guys. That’s why i love it here.

          • rickd12

            Or misunderstood genius…………..BWHAAAAAA HAAAAAA!!

      • Savatage64 (Always Deplorable)

        What ?!? You mean he DOESN’T believe in that? Makes two of us then. He’s still a ‘job’.

        .

        Anyway, I believe there are two possibilities why we (the USA) haven’t been back to the moon.

        1) We really were told to stay away, that they tolerated the 6 landings and then threw rocks at us as we blasted off from the surface.

        2) We beat the Russkies to the moon (that was the goal) and they have yet to land anyone there (unless you take the movie Apollo 18 as having some truth).

        .

        Other than that, we can speculate all we want about NASA (U.S.), or ESA (European) or CNSA (Chinese) space agencies about that. It is important to humans to colonize another rock and the moon idea has been played out and negated for some reason.

        We’ve physically explored the surface of Mars more than the moon (with rovers obviously)…and there’s a reason for that as well.

        • UntrollableRiderOfAPurplePony

          You are indeed a wise sage.

  • nvrat

    Seems the Hubble telescope could take very clear pics of all these of these items.

    • Goatess

      If I’m remembering what I read correctly, for whatever reason, we can’t actually AIM the Hubble at the moon. But even if we could, I wonder if the optics are such that we really wouldn’t be able to see anything that “close” to the Hubble, since it was designed to “look” at things much farther away. Would it be like trying to read a book held at arms’ length through binoculars?

      • nvrat

        I think you are right. The moon would probably be way to close and I`m not sure Hubble could focus.

More in The unexplained

Subscribe to Ancient Code

Enter your email address to subscribe to Ancient Code and receive notifications of new articles by email.

Join 109,740 other subscribers

Visit our Spanish website

Popular on AC

To Top